IIRMX vs. ATGAX
IIRMX (Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Portfolio) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. IIRMX charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
IIRMX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IIRMX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- 16.20%
- 6M
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 26.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
ATGAX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IIRMX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IIRMX Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Portfolio | 0.34% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIRMX and ATGAX is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIRMX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
IIRMX
ATGAX
IIRMX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Portfolio (IIRMX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IIRMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.20 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.57 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IIRMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 58.33 | -57.86 |
Drawdowns
IIRMX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIRMX drawdown since its inception was -56.44%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIRMX and ATGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIRMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.44% | 0.00% | -56.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.88% | 0.00% | -7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | — | — |
Volatility
IIRMX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIRMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.37% | 9.26% | +13.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.33% | 9.26% | +11.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 9.26% | +11.12% |
IIRMX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIRMX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IIRMX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
IIRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.97%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IIRMX Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Portfolio | 37.97% | 13.19% | 10.43% | 11.78% | 10.34% | 10.34% | 14.22% | 20.78% | 15.64% | 8.09% | 14.11% | 10.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIRMX and ATGAX have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IIRMX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer