PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIPR vs. BTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IIPR vs. BTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) and British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIPR achieves a 32.69% return, which is significantly higher than BTI's 11.67% return.


IIPR

1D
-2.07%
1M
12.06%
YTD
32.69%
6M
15.09%
1Y
24.22%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
-13.57%
10Y*

BTI

1D
1.51%
1M
-4.26%
YTD
11.67%
6M
12.20%
1Y
35.30%
3Y*
34.54%
5Y*
17.96%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIPR vs. BTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IIPR
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
32.69%-18.40%-28.55%8.78%-59.02%47.49%151.33%72.52%43.88%82.30%
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
11.67%65.81%35.44%-19.97%14.91%7.95%-4.73%42.97%-49.35%24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IIPR and BTI is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

0.14

The correlation between IIPR and BTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IIPR:

$1.72B

BTI:

$136.67B

EPS

IIPR:

$4.14

BTI:

£4.93

PE Ratio

IIPR:

14.62

BTI:

9.44

PS Ratio

IIPR:

6.51

BTI:

1.99

PB Ratio

IIPR:

0.96

BTI:

2.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

IIPR:

$263.23M

BTI:

£51.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IIPR:

$195.78M

BTI:

£42.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

IIPR:

$210.04M

BTI:

£20.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIPR vs. BTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIPR
IIPR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IIPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIPR Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IIPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIPR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BTI
BTI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIPR vs. BTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) and British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IIPRBTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.26

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.62

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

5.89

-3.24

IIPR vs. BTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the BTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIPR and BTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IIPR vs. BTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIPR drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, which is greater than BTI's maximum drawdown of -64.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIPR and BTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIPRBTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.42%

-64.11%

-14.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.29%

-13.75%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.92%

-13.75%

-49.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.42%

-29.94%

-48.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.14%

-6.57%

-61.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.34%

-12.93%

-24.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.73%

6.10%

+2.63%

Volatility

IIPR vs. BTI - Volatility Comparison

Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) at 7.53%. This indicates that IIPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIPRBTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.13%

7.53%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.31%

18.39%

+11.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.56%

22.78%

+18.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.71%

21.16%

+20.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.46%

24.20%

+24.26%

Dividends

IIPR vs. BTI - Dividend Comparison

IIPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.56%, more than BTI's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
4.95%5.29%8.18%9.72%7.23%7.98%7.22%6.35%8.53%4.27%3.85%4.11%
IIPR
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
12.56%16.05%11.28%7.16%7.01%2.18%2.44%3.73%1.87%1.70%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IIPR vs. BTI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. and British American Tobacco p.l.c.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
69.00M
13.54B
(IIPR) Total Revenue
(BTI) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. IIPR values in USD, BTI values in GBP

IIPR vs. BTI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. and British American Tobacco p.l.c. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
89.0%
83.4%
Portfolio components
IIPR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 61.42M and revenue of 69.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.0%.

BTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a gross profit of 11.30B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.

IIPR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 32.91M and revenue of 69.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.7%.

BTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported an operating income of 4.93B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.

IIPR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 30.16M and revenue of 69.00M, resulting in a net margin of 43.7%.

BTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco p.l.c. reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IIPR and BTI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IIPR has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to BTI (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIPR dropped -78.42% vs BTI's -64.11%.

BTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIPR and BTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer