PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIIN vs. PRLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IIIN vs. PRLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) and Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIIN achieves a -6.54% return, which is significantly lower than PRLB's 61.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IIIN has outperformed PRLB with an annualized return of 4.71%, while PRLB has yielded a comparatively lower 3.79% annualized return.


IIIN

1D
1.55%
1M
11.25%
YTD
-6.54%
6M
-6.57%
1Y
-12.55%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
4.71%

PRLB

1D
0.76%
1M
14.46%
YTD
61.45%
6M
54.03%
1Y
114.72%
3Y*
34.82%
5Y*
-2.35%
10Y*
3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIIN vs. PRLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IIIN
Insteel Industries, Inc.
-6.54%21.53%-26.77%50.01%-25.64%88.28%10.88%-10.98%-13.93%-20.22%
PRLB
Proto Labs, Inc.
61.45%29.42%0.33%52.60%-50.28%-66.53%51.06%-9.97%9.50%100.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IIIN and PRLB is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012

0.37

The correlation between IIIN and PRLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IIIN:

$577.98M

PRLB:

$1.98B

EPS

IIIN:

$2.17

PRLB:

$1.06

PE Ratio

IIIN:

13.59

PRLB:

76.86

PS Ratio

IIIN:

0.84

PRLB:

3.62

PB Ratio

IIIN:

1.59

PRLB:

2.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

IIIN:

$689.91M

PRLB:

$546.26M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IIIN:

$93.93M

PRLB:

$245.03M

EBITDA (TTM)

IIIN:

$69.41M

PRLB:

$60.04M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIIN vs. PRLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIIN
IIIN Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IIIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIIN Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IIIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIIN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

PRLB
PRLB Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PRLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRLB Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PRLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRLB Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIIN vs. PRLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) and Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IIINPRLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.48

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

5.92

-6.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

17.29

-18.03

IIIN vs. PRLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the PRLB Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIIN and PRLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IIIN vs. PRLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIIN drawdown since its inception was -96.63%, which is greater than PRLB's maximum drawdown of -91.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIIN and PRLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIINPRLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.63%

-91.22%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.11%

-19.51%

-16.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.98%

-34.57%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.32%

-77.19%

+29.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.37%

-91.22%

+16.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.82%

-67.52%

+44.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.76%

-43.30%

+4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.95%

6.66%

+10.29%

Volatility

IIIN vs. PRLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) is 7.15%, while Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB) has a volatility of 11.26%. This indicates that IIIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIINPRLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.15%

11.26%

-4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.52%

34.00%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.99%

45.27%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.47%

50.57%

-11.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.85%

47.99%

-4.14%

Dividends

IIIN vs. PRLB - Dividend Comparison

IIIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, while PRLB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IIIN
Insteel Industries, Inc.
3.79%3.54%4.15%6.84%7.70%5.33%7.27%0.56%0.49%0.42%3.84%5.35%
PRLB
Proto Labs, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IIIN vs. PRLB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Insteel Industries, Inc. and Proto Labs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


120.00M140.00M160.00M180.00M200.00M220.00M20222023202420252026
172.65M
139.34M
(IIIN) Total Revenue
(PRLB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IIIN vs. PRLB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Insteel Industries, Inc. and Proto Labs, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
9.6%
45.6%
Portfolio components
IIIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insteel Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.49M and revenue of 172.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

PRLB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Proto Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.59M and revenue of 139.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.

IIIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insteel Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.74M and revenue of 172.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

PRLB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Proto Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.84M and revenue of 139.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

IIIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insteel Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 5.22M and revenue of 172.65M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.

PRLB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Proto Labs, Inc. reported a net income of 8.11M and revenue of 139.34M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IIIN and PRLB have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRLB has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to IIIN (7.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIIN dropped -96.63% vs PRLB's -91.22%.

PRLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIIN and PRLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer