IIF vs. WXCIX
IIF (Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund) and WXCIX (William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, IIF returned 11.82%/yr vs 35.39%/yr for WXCIX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IIF charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for WXCIX.
Performance
IIF vs. WXCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIF achieves a -15.01% return, which is significantly lower than WXCIX's 51.69% return.
IIF
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- -15.01%
- 6M
- -13.88%
- 1Y
- -14.93%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
WXCIX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 10.62%
- YTD
- 51.69%
- 6M
- 57.23%
- 1Y
- 91.16%
- 3Y*
- 35.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IIF vs. WXCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IIF Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund | -15.01% | 6.71% | 29.65% | 22.70% |
WXCIX William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I | 51.69% | 28.21% | 13.49% | 15.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIF and WXCIX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIF vs. WXCIX — Risk / Return Rank
IIF
WXCIX
IIF vs. WXCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) and William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IIF | WXCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | 4.10 | -5.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | 4.94 | -6.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.70 | -0.85 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 6.25 | -6.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | 22.44 | -23.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IIF | WXCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | 4.10 | -5.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 2.02 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
IIF vs. WXCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIF drawdown since its inception was -62.11%, which is greater than WXCIX's maximum drawdown of -19.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIF and WXCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIF | WXCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.11% | -19.66% | -42.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.05% | -14.78% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.05% | -19.66% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.22% | -0.53% | -18.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.78% | -3.15% | -16.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.99% | 4.10% | +5.89% |
Volatility
IIF vs. WXCIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) is 5.32%, while William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that IIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WXCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIF | WXCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 10.26% | -4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 19.46% | -6.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.82% | 22.49% | -6.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 17.98% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 17.98% | +1.81% |
IIF vs. WXCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIF has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than WXCIX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
IIF vs. WXCIX - Dividend Comparison
IIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.35%, more than WXCIX's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIF Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund | 9.35% | 7.95% | 10.67% | 14.61% | 19.62% | 3.75% | 0.02% | 0.14% | 30.40% | 15.23% | 4.46% | 0.16% |
WXCIX William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I | 3.64% | 5.52% | 0.00% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIF and WXCIX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WXCIX has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to IIF (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIF dropped -62.11% vs WXCIX's -19.66%.
WXCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.10 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IIF and WXCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer