PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIF vs. FGKPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IIF vs. FGKPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) and Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund (FGKPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIF achieves a -10.87% return, which is significantly lower than FGKPX's 16.22% return.


IIF

1D
-0.87%
1M
2.70%
YTD
-10.87%
6M
-12.58%
1Y
-11.70%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
8.60%

FGKPX

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.20%
YTD
16.22%
6M
16.22%
1Y
21.56%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIF vs. FGKPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IIF
Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund
-10.87%6.71%29.65%21.43%-9.55%30.87%6.66%3.09%
FGKPX
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
16.22%12.56%5.96%15.28%-12.98%10.75%5.22%3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IIF and FGKPX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2019

0.56

The correlation between IIF and FGKPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIF vs. FGKPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIF
IIF Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIF Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FGKPX
FGKPX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FGKPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGKPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGKPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FGKPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGKPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIF vs. FGKPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) and Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund (FGKPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IIFFGKPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.41

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

3.18

-3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

10.00

-11.10

IIF vs. FGKPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIF Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the FGKPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIF and FGKPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IIF vs. FGKPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIF drawdown since its inception was -62.11%, which is greater than FGKPX's maximum drawdown of -32.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIF and FGKPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIFFGKPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.11%

-32.05%

-30.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.05%

-6.93%

-17.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.05%

-12.67%

-11.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.05%

-20.69%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.28%

-1.40%

-13.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-5.29%

-14.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.71%

2.20%

+8.51%

Volatility

IIF vs. FGKPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) is 4.97%, while Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund (FGKPX) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that IIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGKPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIFFGKPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

5.90%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

9.45%

+4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.95%

10.75%

+5.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

10.45%

+5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

12.59%

+7.19%

IIF vs. FGKPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIF has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FGKPX's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IIF vs. FGKPX - Dividend Comparison

IIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, more than FGKPX's 6.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGKPX
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index Fund
6.66%7.75%5.07%2.91%1.88%2.30%1.77%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IIF
Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund
8.92%7.95%10.67%14.61%19.62%3.75%0.02%0.14%30.40%15.23%4.46%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


IIF and FGKPX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGKPX has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to IIF (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIF dropped -62.11% vs FGKPX's -32.05%.

FGKPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIF and FGKPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer