IIF vs. EAD
IIF (Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund) and EAD (Emerging Markets Dividend Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IIF returned 8.80%/yr vs 7.22%/yr for EAD. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IIF charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for EAD.
Performance
IIF vs. EAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIF achieves a -9.25% return, which is significantly lower than EAD's -1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, IIF has outperformed EAD with an annualized return of 8.80%, while EAD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.22% annualized return.
IIF
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- -9.25%
- 6M
- -10.64%
- 1Y
- -11.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.71%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
EAD
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- 1Y
- 0.70%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
IIF vs. EAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIF Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund | -9.25% | 6.71% | 29.65% | 21.43% | -9.55% | 30.87% | 6.66% | -0.66% | -21.25% | 49.89% |
EAD Emerging Markets Dividend Fund | -1.56% | 8.05% | 15.86% | 11.94% | -23.08% | 21.62% | 6.35% | 27.22% | -6.52% | 7.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIF and EAD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2003 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIF vs. EAD — Risk / Return Rank
IIF
EAD
IIF vs. EAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) and Emerging Markets Dividend Fund (EAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IIF | EAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.02 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 0.09 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 0.32 | -1.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IIF vs. EAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIF drawdown since its inception was -62.11%, smaller than the maximum EAD drawdown of -67.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIF and EAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIF | EAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.11% | -67.37% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.05% | -8.16% | -15.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.05% | -12.65% | -11.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.05% | -29.44% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.05% | -41.54% | -17.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.74% | -4.22% | -9.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -7.14% | -12.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.75% | 2.20% | +8.55% |
Volatility
IIF vs. EAD - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Emerging Markets Dividend Fund (EAD) at 2.35%. This indicates that IIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIF | EAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 2.35% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 7.46% | +6.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 9.42% | +6.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 13.60% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 16.13% | +3.66% |
IIF vs. EAD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIF has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EAD's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IIF vs. EAD - Dividend Comparison
IIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.76%, less than EAD's 10.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAD Emerging Markets Dividend Fund | 10.09% | 9.47% | 9.08% | 9.07% | 10.97% | 7.59% | 8.51% | 8.44% | 9.11% | 8.58% | 9.62% | 10.95% |
IIF Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund | 8.76% | 7.95% | 10.67% | 14.61% | 19.62% | 3.75% | 0.02% | 0.14% | 30.40% | 15.23% | 4.46% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IIF and EAD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IIF has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to EAD (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIF dropped -62.11% vs EAD's -67.37%.
EAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IIF and EAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer