PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIF vs. DEMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IIF vs. DEMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIF achieves a -8.13% return, which is significantly lower than DEMAX's 68.34% return. Over the past 10 years, IIF has underperformed DEMAX with an annualized return of 7.85%, while DEMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.


IIF

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.22%
6M
-1.92%
YTD
-8.13%
1Y
-9.25%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
7.85%
ALL TIME*
13.21%

DEMAX

1D
8.33%
1M
-18.24%
6M
34.37%
YTD
68.34%
1Y
155.43%
3Y*
50.88%
5Y*
22.86%
10Y*
17.69%
ALL TIME*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$680.67K$759.12K$751.79K

IIF vs. DEMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IIF
Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund
-8.13%6.71%29.65%21.43%-9.55%30.87%6.66%-0.66%-21.25%49.89%
DEMAX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A
68.34%86.33%6.25%17.34%-28.85%-2.32%25.54%24.05%-17.32%41.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IIF and DEMAX is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 1996

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between IIF and DEMAX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIF vs. DEMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IIF
IIF Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIF Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMAX
DEMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DEMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IIF vs. DEMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IIFDEMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.43

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

4.04

-4.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

16.82

-17.75

IIF vs. DEMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIF Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the DEMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIF and DEMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IIF vs. DEMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIF drawdown since its inception was -62.11%, roughly equal to the maximum DEMAX drawdown of -63.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIF and DEMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIFDEMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.11%

-63.23%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.52%

-36.53%

+14.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.05%

-36.53%

+12.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.05%

-38.58%

+14.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.05%

-46.51%

-12.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.67%

-31.25%

+18.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.75%

-18.72%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.02%

8.74%

+1.28%

Volatility

IIF vs. DEMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund (IIF) is 4.15%, while Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX) has a volatility of 25.06%. This indicates that IIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIFDEMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

25.06%

-20.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.94%

49.51%

-35.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.16%

52.91%

-36.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

30.11%

-14.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

25.79%

-6.02%

IIF vs. DEMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIF has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMAX's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

IIF vs. DEMAX - Dividend Comparison

IIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.65%, less than DEMAX's 11.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMAX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A
11.30%19.03%1.74%2.76%1.60%3.16%0.56%0.57%0.34%1.59%0.70%0.03%
IIF
Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund
8.65%7.95%10.67%14.61%19.62%3.75%0.02%0.14%30.40%15.23%4.46%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


IIF and DEMAX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMAX has higher volatility (25.06%) compared to IIF (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIF dropped -62.11% vs DEMAX's -63.23%.

DEMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIF and DEMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer