IHYA.L vs. XLVS.L
IHYA.L (iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XLVS.L (Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IHYA.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while XLVS.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IHYA.L returned 3.99%/yr vs 5.76%/yr for XLVS.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IHYA.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLVS.L.
Performance
IHYA.L vs. XLVS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHYA.L achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than XLVS.L's -2.10% return.
IHYA.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 8.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- —
XLVS.L
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- -2.10%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- 6.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
IHYA.L vs. XLVS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHYA.L iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.10% | 9.49% | 6.98% | 10.64% | -8.87% | 3.72% | 5.07% | 12.63% | -1.30% | 2.90% |
XLVS.L Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | -2.10% | 14.78% | 2.15% | 1.56% | -2.62% | 27.57% | 12.04% | 20.54% | 4.30% | 13.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHYA.L and XLVS.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IHYA.L and XLVS.L has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IHYA.L vs. XLVS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHYA.L
XLVS.L
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
IHYA.L
XLVS.L
-
Real Estate
IHYA.L
XLVS.L
-
Basic Materials
IHYA.L
-
XLVS.L
-
Communication Services
IHYA.L
-
XLVS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IHYA.L
-
XLVS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IHYA.L
-
XLVS.L
-
Energy
IHYA.L
-
XLVS.L
-
Financial Services
IHYA.L
-
XLVS.L
-
Healthcare
IHYA.L
-
XLVS.L
Industrials
IHYA.L
-
XLVS.L
-
Technology
IHYA.L
-
XLVS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHYA.L vs. XLVS.L — Risk / Return Rank
IHYA.L
XLVS.L
IHYA.L vs. XLVS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHYA.L) and Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLVS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IHYA.L | XLVS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.18 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 1.44 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.30 | 3.56 | +8.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IHYA.L | XLVS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 1.00 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.39 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.64 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
IHYA.L vs. XLVS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHYA.L drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, smaller than the maximum XLVS.L drawdown of -26.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHYA.L and XLVS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHYA.L | XLVS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.58% | -26.88% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -10.45% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.83% | -17.56% | +12.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.68% | -17.56% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -4.62% | +4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -4.88% | +2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 4.24% | -3.68% |
Volatility
IHYA.L vs. XLVS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHYA.L) is 1.36%, while Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLVS.L) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that IHYA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLVS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHYA.L | XLVS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 4.89% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | 10.78% | -7.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58% | 15.07% | -11.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.81% | 14.74% | -7.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 15.53% | -7.64% |
IHYA.L vs. XLVS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHYA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLVS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHYA.L vs. XLVS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IHYA.L nor XLVS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IHYA.L and XLVS.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IHYA.L.
IHYA.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XLVS.L is Health & Biotech Equities. IHYA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while XLVS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IHYA.L and 0.14% for XLVS.L.
Find the right allocation for IHYA.L and XLVS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer