PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHY vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHY vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHY achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.69% return.


IHY

1D
0.02%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.55%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
4.03%

SGOV

1D
0.04%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.69%
6M
1.79%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHY vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IHY
VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF
1.14%13.39%3.55%12.11%-14.34%-2.82%16.50%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.69%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IHY and SGOV is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHY vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHY
IHY Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHY Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHY vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IHYSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-274.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

196.05

-194.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

399.24

-397.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

4,473.64

-4,469.07

IHY vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHY and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHY vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHY drawdown since its inception was -27.63%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHY and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHYSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.63%

-0.03%

-27.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.75%

-0.01%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.75%

-0.01%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.97%

-0.03%

-26.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

0.00%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-0.00%

-5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

0.00%

+1.33%

Volatility

IHY vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that IHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHYSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

0.06%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.02%

0.13%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.42%

0.19%

+5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.74%

0.24%

+7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.72%

0.24%

+7.48%

IHY vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHY has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IHY vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

IHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHY
VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF
5.68%5.31%5.60%5.26%4.97%4.55%4.65%4.86%4.70%4.36%5.11%5.79%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHY and SGOV have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHY has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHY dropped -27.63% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, SGOV leads with 3.57% vs 1.89% for IHY. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SGOV has performed better with a 3.57% return vs 1.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IHY.

IHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 3.85% for SGOV.

IHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. IHY tracks Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Ex-­‐US Issuers High Yield Constrained Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IHY and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.39 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHY and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer