PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHY vs. IBHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHY vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHY achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than IBHG's 1.15% return.


IHY

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.01%
YTD
0.65%
6M
0.37%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
1.72%
10Y*
4.19%

IBHG

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.42%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHY vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IHY
VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF
0.65%13.39%3.55%12.11%-14.34%-3.82%
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.15%6.90%7.42%11.27%-8.88%0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IHY and IBHG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2021

0.61

The correlation between IHY and IBHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHY vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHY
IHY Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHY Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHY Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

IBHG
IBHG Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IBHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHG Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHY vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IHYIBHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.40

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

6.06

-5.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

22.04

-18.38

IHY vs. IBHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHY Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the IBHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHY and IBHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHY vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHY drawdown since its inception was -27.63%, which is greater than IBHG's maximum drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHY and IBHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHYIBHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.63%

-13.85%

-13.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.75%

-0.73%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.75%

-3.39%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-0.04%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-2.64%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

0.20%

+1.14%

Volatility

IHY vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) at 0.40%. This indicates that IHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHYIBHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

0.40%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.03%

1.51%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.42%

2.09%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.75%

6.33%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.65%

6.33%

+1.32%

IHY vs. IBHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHY has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IHY vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison

IHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than IBHG's 6.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.07%6.33%7.02%6.66%5.62%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IHY
VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF
5.71%5.31%5.60%5.26%4.97%4.55%4.65%4.86%4.70%4.36%5.11%5.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHY and IBHG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHY has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to IBHG (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHY dropped -27.63% vs IBHG's -13.85%.

On 3-year performance, IHY leads with 8.50% vs 7.62% for IBHG. On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IHY has performed better with a 8.50% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IHY.

IBHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.07%, compared with 5.71% for IHY.

IHY tracks Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Ex-­‐US Issuers High Yield Constrained Index, while IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IHY and 0.35% for IBHG.

IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHY and IBHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer