PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHY vs. BSJQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHY vs. BSJQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHY achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than BSJQ's 0.89% return.


IHY

1D
0.19%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.35%
6M
2.41%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
4.06%

BSJQ

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
0.89%
6M
1.20%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
7.03%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHY vs. BSJQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IHY
VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF
1.35%13.39%3.55%12.11%-14.34%-2.82%8.65%12.77%-1.91%
BSJQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF
0.89%6.59%7.49%9.83%-7.35%4.53%2.80%16.74%-4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between IHY and BSJQ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2018

0.55

The correlation between IHY and BSJQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IHY vs. BSJQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IHY
BSJQ

Financial Services

100.0%
39.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

2.1%

Real Estate

-

3.6%

Technology

-

5.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

IHY
100.0%
BSJQ
39.0%

Basic Materials

IHY

-

BSJQ

-

Communication Services

IHY

-

BSJQ
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IHY

-

BSJQ
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

IHY

-

BSJQ

-

Energy

IHY

-

BSJQ
1.6%

Healthcare

IHY

-

BSJQ

-

Industrials

IHY

-

BSJQ
2.1%

Real Estate

IHY

-

BSJQ
3.6%

Technology

IHY

-

BSJQ
5.0%

Utilities

IHY

-

BSJQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHY vs. BSJQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHY
IHY Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHY Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHY Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJQ
BSJQ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BSJQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHY vs. BSJQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IHYBSJQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.76

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

8.55

-7.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

40.68

-35.61

IHY vs. BSJQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the BSJQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHY and BSJQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IHYBSJQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

3.34

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.66

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.54

0.00

Drawdowns

IHY vs. BSJQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHY drawdown since its inception was -27.63%, which is greater than BSJQ's maximum drawdown of -24.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHY and BSJQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHYBSJQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.63%

-24.13%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.75%

-0.54%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.75%

-2.66%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.63%

-11.95%

-15.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.39%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-2.17%

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

0.11%

+1.21%

Volatility

IHY vs. BSJQ - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) at 0.54%. This indicates that IHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHYBSJQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

0.54%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.93%

0.98%

+2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.39%

1.38%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.73%

5.73%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.72%

8.44%

-0.72%

IHY vs. BSJQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHY has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJQ's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

IHY vs. BSJQ - Dividend Comparison

IHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than BSJQ's 5.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF
5.83%6.10%6.58%6.58%5.58%4.27%4.64%4.59%2.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IHY
VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF
5.67%5.31%5.60%5.26%4.97%4.55%4.65%4.86%4.70%4.36%5.11%5.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHY and BSJQ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHY has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to BSJQ (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHY dropped -27.63% vs BSJQ's -24.13%.

On 5-year performance, BSJQ leads with 3.75% vs 1.76% for IHY. On fees, IHY is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BSJQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSJQ has performed better with a 3.75% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IHY is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJQ.

BSJQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.83%, compared with 5.67% for IHY.

IHY tracks Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Ex-­‐US Issuers High Yield Constrained Index, while BSJQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IHY and 0.42% for BSJQ.

BSJQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHY and BSJQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer