PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IHWL.AX vs. QMIX.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IHWL.AX vs. QMIX.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

IHWL.AX (iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF) and QMIX.AX (SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR MSCI World Quality Mix ETF) are both Global Equities funds - IHWL.AX tracks the iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) Index while QMIX.AX tracks the SPDR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHWL.AX returned 12.51%/yr vs 12.58%/yr for QMIX.AX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IHWL.AX vs. QMIX.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHWL.AX) and SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR MSCI World Quality Mix ETF (QMIX.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHWL.AX achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than QMIX.AX's 4.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IHWL.AX having a 12.51% annualized return and QMIX.AX not far ahead at 12.58%.

IHWL.AX

1D
0.03%
1M
0.71%
6M
8.02%
YTD
9.44%
1Y
21.65%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
12.51%

QMIX.AX

1D
0.11%
1M
1.32%
6M
2.97%
YTD
4.91%
1Y
12.46%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
12.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHWL.AX vs. QMIX.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHWL.AX
iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF		9.44%17.85%20.95%26.93%-21.57%31.44%7.65%24.82%-8.18%19.90%
QMIX.AX
SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR MSCI World Quality Mix ETF		4.91%12.23%24.29%18.07%-6.97%28.75%-1.08%29.52%0.77%14.11%

Correlation

The correlation between IHWL.AX and QMIX.AX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2016

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF

SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR MSCI World Quality Mix ETF

Return for Risk

IHWL.AX vs. QMIX.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IHWL.AX
IHWL.AX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IHWL.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHWL.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHWL.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IHWL.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHWL.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
QMIX.AX
QMIX.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
QMIX.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMIX.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMIX.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QMIX.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMIX.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHWL.AX vs. QMIX.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHWL.AX) and SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR MSCI World Quality Mix ETF (QMIX.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IHWL.AXQMIX.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.55
1.49

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.20
2.13

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.64

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

5.21

+3.73

IHWL.AX vs. QMIX.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHWL.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the QMIX.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHWL.AX and QMIX.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHWL.AX vs. QMIX.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHWL.AX drawdown since its inception was -39.03%, which is greater than QMIX.AX's maximum drawdown of -22.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHWL.AX and QMIX.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IHWL.AXQMIX.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.03%

-22.24%

-16.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-7.75%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.96%

-10.87%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.41%

-16.24%

-11.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.03%

-22.24%

-16.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.01%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-3.60%

-1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.48%

-0.03%

Volatility

IHWL.AX vs. QMIX.AX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHWL.AX) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR MSCI World Quality Mix ETF (QMIX.AX) at 1.84%. This indicates that IHWL.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMIX.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IHWL.AXQMIX.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

1.84%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.44%

7.06%

+4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.86%

8.57%

+5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

12.81%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

13.23%

+4.06%

Dividends

IHWL.AX vs. QMIX.AX - Dividend Comparison

IHWL.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than QMIX.AX's 4.45% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IHWL.AX
iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF		5.21%0.98%1.11%3.06%0.77%11.16%0.00%0.00%2.35%1.07%0.00%
QMIX.AX
SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR MSCI World Quality Mix ETF		4.45%3.81%3.95%2.88%4.15%2.83%4.71%2.69%2.73%2.21%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

IHWL.AX and QMIX.AX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHWL.AX tracks iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) Index, while QMIX.AX tracks SPDR Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and SPDR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHWL.AX and QMIX.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer