IHVV.AX vs. CORE.AX
IHVV.AX (iShares S&P 500 AUD Hedged ETF) and CORE.AX (Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds. IHVV.AX is passively managed, while CORE.AX is actively managed. Over the past year, IHVV.AX returned 20.48% vs 15.14% for CORE.AX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
IHVV.AX vs. CORE.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHVV.AX achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly higher than CORE.AX's 4.95% return.
IHVV.AX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 20.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
CORE.AX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 15.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IHVV.AX vs. CORE.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IHVV.AX iShares S&P 500 AUD Hedged ETF | 9.76% | 16.64% |
CORE.AX Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF | 4.95% | 12.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHVV.AX and CORE.AX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | 0.52 |
The correlation between IHVV.AX and CORE.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHVV.AX vs. CORE.AX — Risk / Return Rank
IHVV.AX
CORE.AX
IHVV.AX vs. CORE.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 AUD Hedged ETF (IHVV.AX) and Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF (CORE.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHVV.AX | CORE.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 1.68 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.37 | 4.54 | +4.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHVV.AX vs. CORE.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHVV.AX drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, which is greater than CORE.AX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHVV.AX and CORE.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHVV.AX | CORE.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.07% | -10.20% | -25.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -10.20% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -1.34% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -2.60% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility
IHVV.AX vs. CORE.AX - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 AUD Hedged ETF (IHVV.AX) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF (CORE.AX) at 2.12%. This indicates that IHVV.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CORE.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHVV.AX | CORE.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 2.12% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 7.39% | +3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 12.44% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 12.50% | +5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 12.50% | +6.45% |
Dividends
IHVV.AX vs. CORE.AX - Dividend Comparison
IHVV.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than CORE.AX's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORE.AX Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IHVV.AX iShares S&P 500 AUD Hedged ETF | 4.08% | 0.79% | 0.92% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 19.67% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 3.20% | 1.74% | 0.57% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHVV.AX and CORE.AX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Schroder.
Find the right allocation for IHVV.AX and CORE.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer