PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHHG.L vs. PRIP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHHG.L vs. PRIP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IHHG.L) and Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IHHG.L is traded in GBP, while PRIP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRIP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHHG.L achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than PRIP.L's -0.61% return.


IHHG.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.23%
6M
1.12%
YTD
1.59%
1Y
5.78%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*

PRIP.L

1D
0.34%
1M
-1.45%
6M
-0.99%
YTD
-0.61%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
0.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHHG.L vs. PRIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IHHG.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.59%9.03%6.38%9.77%-10.41%3.44%2.55%1.69%
PRIP.L
Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)
-0.61%0.72%3.72%2.34%-5.39%-0.76%6.78%-22.25%

Correlation

The correlation between IHHG.L and PRIP.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2019

0.03

The correlation between IHHG.L and PRIP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHHG.L vs. PRIP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHHG.L
IHHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IHHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IHHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PRIP.L
PRIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PRIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHHG.L vs. PRIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IHHG.L) and Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IHHG.LPRIP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.10

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

0.80

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

1.79

+8.33

IHHG.L vs. PRIP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHHG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the PRIP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHHG.L and PRIP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHHG.L vs. PRIP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHHG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, smaller than the maximum PRIP.L drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHHG.L and PRIP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHHG.LPRIP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-26.79%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.54%

-4.85%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.38%

-8.76%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.78%

-12.69%

-2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-18.08%

+17.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-20.14%

+17.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

2.16%

-1.59%

Volatility

IHHG.L vs. PRIP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IHHG.L) is 0.79%, while Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that IHHG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHHG.LPRIP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

1.73%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

4.82%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

6.49%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

8.83%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.01%

12.06%

-4.05%

IHHG.L vs. PRIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHHG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIP.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IHHG.L vs. PRIP.L - Dividend Comparison

IHHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, more than PRIP.L's 4.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IHHG.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
6.15%6.06%6.23%5.55%5.21%4.25%4.89%5.47%3.58%
PRIP.L
Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)
4.76%4.73%4.29%4.10%4.14%3.33%3.30%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHHG.L and PRIP.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRIP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IHHG.L.

IHHG.L tracks iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped (USD), while PRIP.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IHHG.L and 0.05% for PRIP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHHG.L and PRIP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer