PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IHEB.AX vs. MVOL.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IHEB.AX vs. MVOL.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

IHEB.AX (iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF) and MVOL.AX (iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IHEB.AX is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) Index, while MVOL.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IHEB.AX returned 1.58%/yr vs 7.29%/yr for MVOL.AX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IHEB.AX vs. MVOL.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHEB.AX) and iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility ETF (MVOL.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IHEB.AX having a 1.27% return and MVOL.AX slightly higher at 1.32%.

IHEB.AX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.76%
6M
1.61%
YTD
1.27%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
8.63%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
3.51%

MVOL.AX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.25%
6M
2.42%
YTD
1.32%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
9.58%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHEB.AX vs. MVOL.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHEB.AX
iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF		1.27%13.46%6.18%9.22%-17.76%-1.00%7.74%18.63%-7.42%12.01%
MVOL.AX
iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility ETF		1.32%12.17%12.96%9.32%-4.40%17.33%-2.46%19.75%-1.61%11.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IHEB.AX and MVOL.AX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016

0.20

The correlation between IHEB.AX and MVOL.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF

iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility ETF

Return for Risk

IHEB.AX vs. MVOL.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IHEB.AX
IHEB.AX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IHEB.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHEB.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHEB.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IHEB.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHEB.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
MVOL.AX
MVOL.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MVOL.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVOL.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVOL.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MVOL.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVOL.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHEB.AX vs. MVOL.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHEB.AX) and iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility ETF (MVOL.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IHEB.AXMVOL.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.50
0.39

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.14
0.60

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.08

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

0.52

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

1.32

+5.70

IHEB.AX vs. MVOL.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHEB.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the MVOL.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHEB.AX and MVOL.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHEB.AX vs. MVOL.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHEB.AX drawdown since its inception was -31.64%, roughly equal to the maximum MVOL.AX drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHEB.AX and MVOL.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IHEB.AXMVOL.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.64%

-33.22%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-7.58%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.51%

-7.83%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.90%

-14.01%

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.64%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-1.38%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-4.10%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

3.03%

-1.79%

Volatility

IHEB.AX vs. MVOL.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHEB.AX) is 1.08%, while iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility ETF (MVOL.AX) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that IHEB.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVOL.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IHEB.AXMVOL.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

2.66%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.82%

8.63%

-3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.75%

10.19%

-4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.73%

11.11%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.04%

12.78%

-0.74%

Dividends

IHEB.AX vs. MVOL.AX - Dividend Comparison

IHEB.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than MVOL.AX's 1.30% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHEB.AX
iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF		6.02%5.74%9.24%5.17%8.58%6.14%9.71%6.51%3.59%6.82%
MVOL.AX
iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility ETF		1.30%4.16%4.80%5.19%3.72%2.71%2.67%2.95%7.87%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

IHEB.AX and MVOL.AX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHEB.AX is categorized as Total Bond Market, while MVOL.AX is Global Equities. IHEB.AX tracks iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) Index, while MVOL.AX tracks iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHEB.AX and MVOL.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer