IHEB.AX vs. GLDN.AX
IHEB.AX (iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF) and GLDN.AX (Ishares Physical Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IHEB.AX is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) Index, while GLDN.AX is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM AUD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IHEB.AX returned 8.50% vs 12.58% for GLDN.AX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IHEB.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHEB.AX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than GLDN.AX's -11.15% return.
IHEB.AX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
GLDN.AX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- 6M
- -16.42%
- YTD
- -11.15%
- 1Y
- 12.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IHEB.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IHEB.AX iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF | 1.27% | 13.46% | 6.18% | 10.41% |
GLDN.AX Ishares Physical Gold ETF | -11.15% | 55.11% | 38.15% | -3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHEB.AX and GLDN.AX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHEB.AX vs. GLDN.AX — Risk / Return Rank
IHEB.AX
GLDN.AX
IHEB.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHEB.AX) and Ishares Physical Gold ETF (GLDN.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHEB.AX | GLDN.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.12 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 0.46 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 1.00 | +6.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHEB.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHEB.AX drawdown since its inception was -31.64%, which is greater than GLDN.AX's maximum drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHEB.AX and GLDN.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHEB.AX | GLDN.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.64% | -26.62% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.64% | -26.62% | +21.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -26.28% | +25.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -5.16% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 12.44% | -11.20% |
Volatility
IHEB.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHEB.AX) is 1.08%, while Ishares Physical Gold ETF (GLDN.AX) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that IHEB.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDN.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHEB.AX | GLDN.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 6.35% | -5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.82% | 21.71% | -16.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.75% | 25.11% | -19.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.73% | 19.55% | -8.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.04% | 19.55% | -7.51% |
Dividends
IHEB.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Dividend Comparison
IHEB.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, while GLDN.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDN.AX Ishares Physical Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IHEB.AX iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF | 6.02% | 5.74% | 9.24% | 5.17% | 8.58% | 6.14% | 9.71% | 6.51% | 3.59% | 6.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHEB.AX and GLDN.AX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHEB.AX is categorized as Total Bond Market, while GLDN.AX is Gold. IHEB.AX tracks iShares JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond (AUD Hedged) Index, while GLDN.AX tracks LBMA Gold Price PM AUD Index.
Find the right allocation for IHEB.AX and GLDN.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer