PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IHCB.AX vs. ISEC.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IHCB.AX vs. ISEC.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

IHCB.AX (iShares Core Global Corporate Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF) and ISEC.AX (iShares Enhanced Cash ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IHCB.AX is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iShares Core Global Corporate Bond (AUD Hedged) Index, while ISEC.AX is a Money Market fund tracking the iShares Enhanced Cash Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IHCB.AX returned -0.65%/yr vs 3.28%/yr for ISEC.AX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IHCB.AX vs. ISEC.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Corporate Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHCB.AX) and iShares Enhanced Cash ETF (ISEC.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHCB.AX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than ISEC.AX's 1.94% return.

IHCB.AX

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.18%
6M
0.29%
YTD
0.48%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
1.27%

ISEC.AX

1D
0.02%
1M
0.43%
6M
1.75%
YTD
1.94%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHCB.AX vs. ISEC.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHCB.AX
iShares Core Global Corporate Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF		0.48%6.31%2.34%6.23%-15.93%-1.45%5.96%10.36%-2.80%1.95%
ISEC.AX
iShares Enhanced Cash ETF		1.94%4.40%4.74%4.06%1.29%0.08%0.63%1.77%2.05%1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IHCB.AX and ISEC.AX is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2017

0.04

The correlation between IHCB.AX and ISEC.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Global Corporate Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF

iShares Enhanced Cash ETF

Often compared with IHCB.AX:
IHCB.AX vs. RCB.AXIHCB.AX vs. BANK.AXIHCB.AX vs. VACF.AXIHCB.AX vs. VCF.AXIHCB.AX vs. FLOT.AXIHCB.AX vs. HBRD.AXIHCB.AX vs. IEM.AX
Often compared with ISEC.AX:
ISEC.AX vs. MVOL.AXISEC.AX vs. WVOL.AXISEC.AX vs. GLIN.AXISEC.AX vs. IHWL.AXISEC.AX vs. ILB.AXISEC.AX vs. IOZ.AXISEC.AX vs. WDMF.AX

Return for Risk

IHCB.AX vs. ISEC.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IHCB.AX
IHCB.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IHCB.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHCB.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHCB.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IHCB.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHCB.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
ISEC.AX
ISEC.AX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ISEC.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISEC.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISEC.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ISEC.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISEC.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHCB.AX vs. ISEC.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Corporate Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHCB.AX) and iShares Enhanced Cash ETF (ISEC.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IHCB.AXISEC.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.88
3.59

-2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.28
5.05

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

2.74

-1.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

9.83

-8.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.13

30.27

-26.14

IHCB.AX vs. ISEC.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHCB.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the ISEC.AX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHCB.AX and ISEC.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHCB.AX vs. ISEC.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHCB.AX drawdown since its inception was -21.96%, which is greater than ISEC.AX's maximum drawdown of -0.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHCB.AX and ISEC.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IHCB.AXISEC.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-0.38%

-21.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-0.38%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.96%

-0.38%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.96%

-0.38%

-21.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.96%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

0.00%

-4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-0.03%

-5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.12%

+0.78%

Volatility

IHCB.AX vs. ISEC.AX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Global Corporate Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF (IHCB.AX) has a higher volatility of 0.86% compared to iShares Enhanced Cash ETF (ISEC.AX) at 0.09%. This indicates that IHCB.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISEC.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IHCB.AXISEC.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

0.09%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.56%

0.78%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

1.03%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.41%

0.72%

+6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.48%

0.57%

+7.91%

Dividends

IHCB.AX vs. ISEC.AX - Dividend Comparison

IHCB.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than ISEC.AX's 3.75% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IHCB.AX
iShares Core Global Corporate Bond (AUD Hedged) ETF		4.23%4.46%4.47%3.22%1.19%3.35%2.49%1.40%1.77%3.91%0.45%
ISEC.AX
iShares Enhanced Cash ETF		3.75%4.32%4.55%3.93%1.05%0.13%0.57%1.68%1.96%0.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IHCB.AX and ISEC.AX have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHCB.AX is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ISEC.AX is Money Market. IHCB.AX tracks iShares Core Global Corporate Bond (AUD Hedged) Index, while ISEC.AX tracks iShares Enhanced Cash Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHCB.AX and ISEC.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer