IH2O.L vs. SWDA.L
IH2O.L (iShares Global Water UCITS ETF) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IH2O.L is a Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water TR, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IH2O.L returned 10.41%/yr vs 13.91%/yr for SWDA.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IH2O.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
IH2O.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IH2O.L achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 10.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IH2O.L has underperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 10.41%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.91% annualized return.
IH2O.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 27.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
IH2O.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF | -1.56% | 10.23% | 6.31% | 7.67% | -11.13% | 33.06% | 11.63% | 29.99% | -4.91% | 16.22% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.08% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 12.25% | 23.03% | -3.78% | 11.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IH2O.L and SWDA.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2009 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IH2O.L and SWDA.L has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IH2O.L vs. SWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IH2O.L
SWDA.L
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
IH2O.L
SWDA.L
Industrials
IH2O.L
SWDA.L
Basic Materials
IH2O.L
SWDA.L
Energy
IH2O.L
SWDA.L
Technology
IH2O.L
SWDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
IH2O.L
SWDA.L
Real Estate
IH2O.L
SWDA.L
Communication Services
IH2O.L
-
SWDA.L
Consumer Defensive
IH2O.L
-
SWDA.L
Financial Services
IH2O.L
-
SWDA.L
Healthcare
IH2O.L
-
SWDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IH2O.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IH2O.L
SWDA.L
IH2O.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IH2O.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.51 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 4.14 | -3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | 16.55 | -15.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IH2O.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 2.66 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.98 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.96 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.88 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
IH2O.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IH2O.L drawdown since its inception was -35.40%, which is greater than SWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IH2O.L and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IH2O.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.40% | -25.58% | -9.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -6.55% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -18.50% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.14% | -18.50% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.16% | -25.58% | -1.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -0.10% | -8.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -3.49% | -2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 1.64% | +2.22% |
Volatility
IH2O.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.52%. This indicates that IH2O.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IH2O.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 2.52% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 7.29% | +2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 10.19% | +2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 13.30% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 14.50% | +0.42% |
IH2O.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IH2O.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IH2O.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
IH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF | 1.91% | 1.78% | 1.34% | 1.51% | 1.32% | 2.25% | 1.29% | 1.84% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 2.17% | 2.45% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IH2O.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IH2O.L.
IH2O.L is categorized as Water Equities, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. IH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water TR, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IH2O.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for IH2O.L and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer