IH2O.L vs. IITU.L
IH2O.L (iShares Global Water UCITS ETF) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IH2O.L is a Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water TR, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IH2O.L returned 10.41%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IH2O.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
IH2O.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IH2O.L achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IH2O.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 10.41%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
IH2O.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -2.67%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
IH2O.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF | -1.56% | 10.23% | 6.31% | 7.67% | -11.13% | 33.06% | 11.63% | 29.99% | -4.91% | 16.22% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between IH2O.L and IITU.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IH2O.L and IITU.L has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IH2O.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IH2O.L
IITU.L
Utilities
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
IH2O.L
IITU.L
-
Industrials
IH2O.L
IITU.L
Basic Materials
IH2O.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
IH2O.L
IITU.L
Technology
IH2O.L
IITU.L
Consumer Cyclical
IH2O.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
IH2O.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
IH2O.L
-
IITU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IH2O.L
-
IITU.L
-
Financial Services
IH2O.L
-
IITU.L
-
Healthcare
IH2O.L
-
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IH2O.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IH2O.L
IITU.L
IH2O.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IH2O.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.44 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 3.17 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | 8.17 | -6.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IH2O.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 2.71 | -2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 1.16 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 1.28 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.23 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
IH2O.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IH2O.L drawdown since its inception was -35.40%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IH2O.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IH2O.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.40% | -28.03% | -7.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -16.76% | +6.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -28.03% | +14.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.14% | -28.03% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.16% | -28.03% | +0.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -2.89% | -6.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -5.14% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 6.51% | -2.65% |
Volatility
IH2O.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) is 3.95%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that IH2O.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IH2O.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 7.01% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 14.45% | -4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 19.60% | -7.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 21.94% | -7.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 21.31% | -6.39% |
IH2O.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IH2O.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IH2O.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
IH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF | 1.91% | 1.78% | 1.34% | 1.51% | 1.32% | 2.25% | 1.29% | 1.84% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 2.17% | 2.45% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IH2O.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IH2O.L.
IH2O.L is categorized as Water Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. IH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water TR, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IH2O.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for IH2O.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer