PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IH2O.L vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IH2O.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IH2O.L is traded in GBp, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IH2O.L achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, IH2O.L has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 10.41%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.13% annualized return.


IH2O.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
-2.67%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
6.36%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
10.41%

GLD

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.34%
YTD
4.20%
6M
5.72%
1Y
34.48%
3Y*
27.81%
5Y*
19.62%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IH2O.L vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IH2O.L
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF
-1.56%10.23%6.31%7.67%-11.13%33.06%11.63%29.99%-4.91%16.22%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.99%52.02%28.87%7.06%11.03%-3.24%21.15%13.37%3.87%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IH2O.L and GLD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2007

0.06

IH2O.L vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IH2O.L
GLD

Utilities

46.1%

-

Industrials

44.2%

-

Basic Materials

5.8%
100.0%

Energy

1.9%

-

Technology

1.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%

-

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

IH2O.L
46.1%
GLD

-

Industrials

IH2O.L
44.2%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

IH2O.L
5.8%
GLD
100.0%

Energy

IH2O.L
1.9%
GLD

-

Technology

IH2O.L
1.2%
GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

IH2O.L
0.5%
GLD

-

Real Estate

IH2O.L
0.2%
GLD

-

Communication Services

IH2O.L

-

GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

IH2O.L

-

GLD

-

Financial Services

IH2O.L

-

GLD

-

Healthcare

IH2O.L

-

GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IH2O.L vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IH2O.L
IH2O.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IH2O.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IH2O.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IH2O.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IH2O.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IH2O.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IH2O.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IH2O.LGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.28

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

1.95

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

4.77

-3.55

IH2O.L vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IH2O.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IH2O.L and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IH2O.LGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

1.37

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

1.18

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.87

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.70

-0.09

Drawdowns

IH2O.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IH2O.L drawdown since its inception was -35.40%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IH2O.L and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IH2O.LGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.40%

-41.89%

+6.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-17.78%

+7.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.96%

-17.78%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.14%

-17.78%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.16%

-22.78%

-4.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.03%

-16.16%

+7.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-13.21%

+7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

7.24%

-3.38%

Volatility

IH2O.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) have volatilities of 3.95% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IH2O.LGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.81%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

21.73%

-11.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

25.28%

-13.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

16.70%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

16.22%

-1.30%

IH2O.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IH2O.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IH2O.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

IH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IH2O.L
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF
1.91%1.78%1.34%1.51%1.32%2.25%1.29%1.84%2.30%1.98%2.17%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


IH2O.L and GLD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IH2O.L.

IH2O.L is categorized as Water Equities, while GLD is Gold. IH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water TR, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IH2O.L and 0.40% for GLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IH2O.L and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer