IH2O.L vs. AQWA.L
IH2O.L (iShares Global Water UCITS ETF) and AQWA.L (Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Water Equities funds - IH2O.L tracks the S&P Global Water TR while AQWA.L tracks the Solactive Global Clean Water Industry v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IH2O.L returned 7.96%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for AQWA.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IH2O.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for AQWA.L.
Performance
IH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IH2O.L is traded in GBp, while AQWA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AQWA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IH2O.L achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than AQWA.L's 1.83% return.
IH2O.L
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
AQWA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- 6M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 1.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF | 2.32% | 9.75% | 6.03% | 7.33% | -11.32% | 1.70% |
AQWA.L Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.83% | 4.91% | 7.83% | 18.90% | -9.78% | -0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IH2O.L and AQWA.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IH2O.L and AQWA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IH2O.L vs. AQWA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IH2O.L
AQWA.L
IH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) and Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc (AQWA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IH2O.L | AQWA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.05 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.31 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 0.69 | +0.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IH2O.L drawdown since its inception was -67.32%, which is greater than AQWA.L's maximum drawdown of -21.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IH2O.L and AQWA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IH2O.L | AQWA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.32% | -21.97% | -45.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.50% | -11.36% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -18.10% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.45% | -7.25% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.47% | -6.67% | -13.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 5.06% | -0.63% |
Volatility
IH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) is 4.61%, while Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc (AQWA.L) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that IH2O.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AQWA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IH2O.L | AQWA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 4.98% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 12.14% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.94% | 14.97% | -2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 16.15% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 16.15% | -1.25% |
IH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IH2O.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AQWA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IH2O.L vs. AQWA.L - Dividend Comparison
IH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while AQWA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQWA.L Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF | 1.38% | 1.35% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.67% | 1.00% | 1.43% | 1.77% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IH2O.L and AQWA.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AQWA.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AQWA.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IH2O.L.
IH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water TR, while AQWA.L tracks Solactive Global Clean Water Industry v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IH2O.L and 0.50% for AQWA.L.
Find the right allocation for IH2O.L and AQWA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer