IGUS.L vs. IITU.L
IGUS.L (iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IGUS.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGUS.L returned 13.48%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGUS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
IGUS.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGUS.L achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IGUS.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 13.48%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
IGUS.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 27.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
IGUS.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGUS.L iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 9.82% | 17.39% | 24.64% | 24.49% | -20.60% | 28.57% | 14.63% | 27.27% | -7.47% | 19.85% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGUS.L and IITU.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IGUS.L and IITU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGUS.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGUS.L
IITU.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
IGUS.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
IGUS.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
IGUS.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGUS.L
IITU.L
-
Healthcare
IGUS.L
IITU.L
-
Industrials
IGUS.L
IITU.L
Consumer Defensive
IGUS.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
IGUS.L
IITU.L
Utilities
IGUS.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
IGUS.L
IITU.L
-
Basic Materials
IGUS.L
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGUS.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGUS.L
IITU.L
IGUS.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IGUS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGUS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.17 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 8.17 | +5.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGUS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.71 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 1.16 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 1.28 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.23 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
IGUS.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGUS.L drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGUS.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGUS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.66% | -28.03% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -16.76% | +8.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | -28.03% | +9.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -28.03% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.66% | -28.03% | -8.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -2.89% | +2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -5.14% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 6.51% | -4.57% |
Volatility
IGUS.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IGUS.L) is 3.21%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that IGUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGUS.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 7.01% | -3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 14.45% | -5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 19.60% | -7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 21.94% | -5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 21.31% | -4.73% |
IGUS.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGUS.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGUS.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IGUS.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IGUS.L.
IGUS.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. IGUS.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IGUS.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for IGUS.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer