PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGME vs. LQTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGME vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGME achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's -0.18% return.


IGME

1D
-1.86%
1M
-10.54%
YTD
12.57%
6M
1.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LQTI

1D
-0.80%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
0.12%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGME vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IGME and LQTI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGME vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGME

LQTI
LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGME vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IGME vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGMELQTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.83

-1.26

Drawdowns

IGME vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGME drawdown since its inception was -26.33%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGME and LQTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGMELQTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.33%

-3.41%

-22.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.22%

-1.77%

-13.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.49%

-0.88%

-13.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

Volatility

IGME vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGMELQTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.50%

5.15%

+30.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.50%

6.01%

+29.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.50%

6.01%

+29.49%

IGME vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGME has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGME vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

IGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.20%, more than LQTI's 9.14% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IGME and LQTI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for IGME.

IGME has the higher dividend yield at 88.20%, compared with 9.14% for LQTI.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for IGME and 0.65% for LQTI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGME and LQTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer