IGME vs. LQTI
IGME (Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGME charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
IGME vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGME achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's -0.18% return.
IGME
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -10.54%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGME vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IGME Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF | 12.57% | -24.69% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -0.18% | 5.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGME and LQTI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGME vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
IGME
LQTI
IGME vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGME | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.83 | -1.26 |
Drawdowns
IGME vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGME drawdown since its inception was -26.33%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGME and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGME | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.33% | -3.41% | -22.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.22% | -1.77% | -13.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.49% | -0.88% | -13.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
IGME vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGME | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.50% | 5.15% | +30.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.50% | 6.01% | +29.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.50% | 6.01% | +29.49% |
IGME vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGME has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGME vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
IGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.20%, more than LQTI's 9.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IGME Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF | 88.20% | 69.25% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.14% | 7.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGME and LQTI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for IGME.
IGME has the higher dividend yield at 88.20%, compared with 9.14% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for IGME and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for IGME and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer