PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGME vs. FTQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGME vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGME achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly higher than FTQI's 10.11% return.


IGME

1D
3.49%
1M
2.69%
YTD
14.61%
6M
9.47%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTQI

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
10.11%
6M
9.11%
1Y
24.89%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
8.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGME vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IGME and FTQI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGME vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGME
IGME Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IGME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGME Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGME Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IGME Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGME Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGME vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGMEFTQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.45

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

4.01

-3.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

19.01

-18.82

IGME vs. FTQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGME Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the FTQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGME and FTQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGME vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGME drawdown since its inception was -26.33%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGME and FTQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGMEFTQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.33%

-19.42%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.70%

-6.24%

-19.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.69%

-1.45%

-12.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.44%

-3.74%

-10.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.54%

1.31%

+11.23%

Volatility

IGME vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) at 3.19%. This indicates that IGME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGMEFTQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.24%

3.19%

+5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.49%

8.53%

+10.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.27%

10.63%

+16.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.87%

14.82%

+20.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.87%

13.28%

+21.59%

IGME vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGME has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGME vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison

IGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.88%, more than FTQI's 11.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
11.18%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%
IGME
Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF
89.88%69.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGME and FTQI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGME has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to FTQI (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGME dropped -26.33% vs FTQI's -19.42%.

On 1-year performance, FTQI leads with 24.89% vs 2.39% for IGME. On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FTQI has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTQI has performed better with a 24.89% return vs 2.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for IGME.

IGME has the higher dividend yield at 89.88%, compared with 11.18% for FTQI.

IGME is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for IGME and 0.75% for FTQI.

FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGME and FTQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer