PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGME vs. BUYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGME vs. BUYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGME achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly higher than BUYW's 3.62% return.


IGME

1D
3.49%
1M
2.69%
YTD
14.61%
6M
9.47%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUYW

1D
0.14%
1M
0.23%
YTD
3.62%
6M
3.91%
1Y
9.15%
3Y*
8.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGME vs. BUYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IGME
Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF
14.61%-24.20%
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
3.62%6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IGME and BUYW is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGME vs. BUYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGME
IGME Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IGME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGME Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGME Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IGME Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGME Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

BUYW
BUYW Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BUYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYW Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGME vs. BUYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGMEBUYWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.37

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

3.55

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

18.90

-18.70

IGME vs. BUYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGME Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the BUYW Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGME and BUYW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGME vs. BUYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGME drawdown since its inception was -26.33%, which is greater than BUYW's maximum drawdown of -9.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGME and BUYW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGMEBUYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.33%

-9.36%

-16.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.70%

-2.59%

-23.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.69%

-0.12%

-13.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.44%

-0.60%

-13.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.54%

0.49%

+12.05%

Volatility

IGME vs. BUYW - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) at 1.42%. This indicates that IGME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGMEBUYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.24%

1.42%

+6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.49%

3.90%

+15.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.27%

4.85%

+22.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.87%

8.42%

+26.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.87%

8.42%

+26.45%

IGME vs. BUYW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGME has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than BUYW's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGME vs. BUYW - Dividend Comparison

IGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.88%, more than BUYW's 5.94% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
5.94%5.89%5.93%5.95%0.50%
IGME
Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF
89.88%69.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGME and BUYW have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGME has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to BUYW (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGME dropped -26.33% vs BUYW's -9.36%.

On 1-year performance, BUYW leads with 9.15% vs 2.39% for IGME. On fees, IGME is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, BUYW has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUYW has performed better with a 9.15% return vs 2.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGME is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.

IGME has the higher dividend yield at 89.88%, compared with 5.94% for BUYW.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Main Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for IGME and 1.29% for BUYW.

BUYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGME and BUYW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer