IGM vs. TSXU
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGM charges 0.46%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
IGM vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
IGM
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 16.93%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 62.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.04%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGM vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 31.32% | 1.90% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and TSXU is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
TSXU
IGM vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 4.53 | -4.05 |
Drawdowns
IGM vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -35.62% | -29.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -0.92% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -10.56% | -4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | — | — |
Volatility
IGM vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 78.68% | -58.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 78.68% | -53.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 78.68% | -54.14% |
IGM vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and TSXU have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.12% for IGM.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. IGM tracks S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGM and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for IGM and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer