PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGM vs. SOUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGM vs. SOUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 23.42% return, which is significantly higher than SOUN's -30.79% return.


IGM

1D
0.69%
1M
3.04%
YTD
23.42%
6M
23.24%
1Y
48.57%
3Y*
35.37%
5Y*
20.09%
10Y*
24.57%

SOUN

1D
-1.43%
1M
-18.05%
YTD
-30.79%
6M
-40.77%
1Y
-27.14%
3Y*
29.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGM vs. SOUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
23.42%26.76%36.99%60.68%-15.68%
SOUN
SoundHound AI, Inc.
-30.79%-49.75%835.85%19.77%-79.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IGM and SOUN is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022

0.37

The correlation between IGM and SOUN shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGM vs. SOUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SOUN
SOUN Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SOUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOUN Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SOUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOUN Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGM vs. SOUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGMSOUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.00

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

-0.38

+3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

-0.60

+10.66

IGM vs. SOUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGM Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the SOUN Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGM and SOUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGM vs. SOUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, smaller than the maximum SOUN drawdown of -93.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and SOUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGMSOUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.59%

-93.55%

+27.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-72.43%

+55.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-75.65%

+49.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.80%

-71.52%

+64.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.22%

-66.93%

+51.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

45.29%

-40.45%

Volatility

IGM vs. SOUN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is 10.03%, while SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) has a volatility of 17.69%. This indicates that IGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGMSOUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.03%

17.69%

-7.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.11%

52.15%

-34.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.98%

80.70%

-58.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.91%

136.27%

-110.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.66%

136.27%

-111.61%

Dividends

IGM vs. SOUN - Dividend Comparison

IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while SOUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.13%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
SOUN
SoundHound AI, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGM and SOUN have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOUN has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to IGM (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs SOUN's -93.55%.

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGM and SOUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer