IGM vs. SKYY
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and SKYY (First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund) are both Technology Equities funds - IGM tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index while SKYY tracks the ISE Cloud Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGM returned 24.57%/yr vs 16.26%/yr for SKYY. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SKYY.
Performance
IGM vs. SKYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 23.42% return, which is significantly higher than SKYY's 3.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed SKYY with an annualized return of 24.57%, while SKYY has yielded a comparatively lower 16.26% annualized return.
IGM
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 23.42%
- 6M
- 23.24%
- 1Y
- 48.57%
- 3Y*
- 35.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.57%
SKYY
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 13.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
IGM vs. SKYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 23.42% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
SKYY First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund | 3.03% | 9.20% | 35.87% | 52.18% | -44.68% | 10.62% | 57.77% | 25.25% | 6.01% | 33.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and SKYY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2011 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IGM and SKYY shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGM vs. SKYY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGM
SKYY
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGM
SKYY
Communication Services
IGM
SKYY
Financial Services
IGM
SKYY
-
Industrials
IGM
SKYY
Energy
IGM
SKYY
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGM
SKYY
Basic Materials
IGM
-
SKYY
-
Consumer Defensive
IGM
-
SKYY
-
Healthcare
IGM
-
SKYY
Real Estate
IGM
-
SKYY
-
Utilities
IGM
-
SKYY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. SKYY — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
SKYY
IGM vs. SKYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGM | SKYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.11 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 0.51 | +2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 1.13 | +8.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGM vs. SKYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than SKYY's maximum drawdown of -53.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and SKYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | SKYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -53.20% | -12.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -27.39% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -31.80% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -53.20% | +12.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | -53.20% | +12.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.80% | -13.63% | +6.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -10.90% | -4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 12.34% | -7.50% |
Volatility
IGM vs. SKYY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is 10.03%, while First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY) has a volatility of 13.09%. This indicates that IGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SKYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | SKYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 13.09% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.11% | 23.88% | -5.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.98% | 28.45% | -6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 30.67% | -4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 26.90% | -2.24% |
IGM vs. SKYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SKYY's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. SKYY - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while SKYY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
SKYY First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 0.78% | 0.17% | 0.54% | 0.37% | 0.27% | 0.35% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and SKYY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKYY has higher volatility (13.09%) compared to IGM (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs SKYY's -53.20%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 24.57% vs 16.26% for SKYY. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 10.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 24.57% return vs 16.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SKYY.
IGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for SKYY.
IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while SKYY tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.60% for SKYY.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and SKYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer