IGM vs. GRRR
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while GRRR (Gorilla Technology Group Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, IGM returned 35.37%/yr vs -0.38%/yr for GRRR. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IGM vs. GRRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 23.42% return, which is significantly lower than GRRR's 59.34% return.
IGM
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 23.42%
- 6M
- 23.24%
- 1Y
- 48.57%
- 3Y*
- 35.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.57%
GRRR
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- 25.54%
- YTD
- 59.34%
- 6M
- 26.64%
- 1Y
- -15.49%
- 3Y*
- -0.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGM vs. GRRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 23.42% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -5.80% |
GRRR Gorilla Technology Group Inc. | 59.34% | -39.53% | 234.82% | -93.35% | -45.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and GRRR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.18 |
Over the past year, IGM and GRRR have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. GRRR — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
GRRR
IGM vs. GRRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Gorilla Technology Group Inc. (GRRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGM | GRRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.04 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | -0.25 | +3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | -0.38 | +10.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGM vs. GRRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, smaller than the maximum GRRR drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and GRRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | GRRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -99.38% | +33.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -62.45% | +46.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -96.27% | +69.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.80% | -95.20% | +88.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -91.93% | +76.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 41.22% | -36.38% |
Volatility
IGM vs. GRRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is 10.03%, while Gorilla Technology Group Inc. (GRRR) has a volatility of 33.91%. This indicates that IGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | GRRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 33.91% | -23.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.11% | 59.91% | -41.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.98% | 87.88% | -65.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 163.67% | -137.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 163.67% | -139.01% |
Dividends
IGM vs. GRRR - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while GRRR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRRR Gorilla Technology Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and GRRR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRRR has higher volatility (33.91%) compared to IGM (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs GRRR's -99.38%.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and GRRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer