PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGM vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGM vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.


IGM

1D
-0.84%
1M
16.93%
YTD
31.32%
6M
29.19%
1Y
62.26%
3Y*
39.18%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
25.19%

FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGM vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
31.32%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%25.72%45.11%41.81%2.26%37.20%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
115.70%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%46.08%61.77%-14.47%32.19%

Correlation

The correlation between IGM and FTXL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.81

The correlation between IGM and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGM vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGM
FTXL

Technology

82.8%
99.5%

Communication Services

16.8%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.2%
0.5%

Energy

0.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IGM
82.8%
FTXL
99.5%

Communication Services

IGM
16.8%
FTXL

-

Financial Services

IGM
0.2%
FTXL

-

Industrials

IGM
0.2%
FTXL
0.5%

Energy

IGM
0.1%
FTXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

IGM
0.1%
FTXL

-

Basic Materials

IGM

-

FTXL

-

Consumer Defensive

IGM

-

FTXL

-

Healthcare

IGM

-

FTXL

-

Real Estate

IGM

-

FTXL

-

Utilities

IGM

-

FTXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGM vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGM vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGMFTXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.78

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

15.62

-11.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.36

58.28

-44.93

IGM vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGM Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is lower than the FTXL Sharpe Ratio of 6.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGM and FTXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGMFTXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

6.33

-3.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.97

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.94

-0.45

Drawdowns

IGM vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than FTXL's maximum drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGMFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.59%

-43.87%

-21.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-14.51%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-41.57%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.68%

-43.87%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

0.00%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.23%

-10.56%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

3.88%

+0.79%

Volatility

IGM vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is 6.10%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that IGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGMFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

14.28%

-8.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.08%

28.98%

-12.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.43%

35.94%

-15.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.68%

36.02%

-10.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.54%

34.25%

-9.71%

IGM vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGM has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGM vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, which matches FTXL's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%0.00%
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.12%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGM and FTXL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to IGM (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs FTXL's -43.87%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 22.04% for IGM. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 22.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGM is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.

IGM and FTXL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.12%.

IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. IGM tracks S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGM and 0.60% for FTXL.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 3.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGM and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer