IGLT.L vs. CBND.L
IGLT.L (iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF) and CBND.L (Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Government Bonds funds - IGLT.L tracks the FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index while CBND.L tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGLT.L returned -4.97%/yr vs 3.38%/yr for CBND.L. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. IGLT.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for CBND.L.
Performance
IGLT.L vs. CBND.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLT.L is traded in GBP, while CBND.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CBND.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLT.L achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than CBND.L's 5.66% return.
IGLT.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 1Y
- 1.89%
- 3Y*
- 2.17%
- 5Y*
- -4.97%
- 10Y*
- -1.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.25%
CBND.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 4.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| £8.63K | £4.90K | £2.18K | |
| £3.50M | £6.04M | £5.78M |
IGLT.L vs. CBND.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | -1.10% | 4.70% | -3.34% | 3.61% | -23.74% | -5.00% | 8.06% | -0.58% |
CBND.L Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.66% | -2.44% | 6.50% | -3.78% | 6.10% | 8.62% | 5.51% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLT.L and CBND.L is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLT.L vs. CBND.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGLT.L
CBND.L
IGLT.L vs. CBND.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) and Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CBND.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGLT.L | CBND.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.24 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 2.52 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.76 | 6.94 | -6.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGLT.L vs. CBND.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.56%, which is greater than CBND.L's maximum drawdown of -16.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLT.L and CBND.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLT.L | CBND.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.56% | -16.35% | -19.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.00% | -3.40% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.96% | -9.09% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.53% | -16.35% | -17.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.15% | -3.30% | -22.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -7.46% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 1.24% | +0.95% |
Volatility
IGLT.L vs. CBND.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CBND.L) at 1.59%. This indicates that IGLT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBND.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLT.L | CBND.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 1.59% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.14% | 4.90% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.94% | 6.40% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.31% | 7.91% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.13% | 8.33% | +0.80% |
IGLT.L vs. CBND.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLT.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CBND.L's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLT.L vs. CBND.L - Dividend Comparison
IGLT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than CBND.L's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBND.L Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.04% | 2.20% | 2.45% | 2.54% | 2.72% | 2.52% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | 4.51% | 4.26% | 3.69% | 2.40% | 1.32% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.30% | 1.88% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLT.L and CBND.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGLT.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLT.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for CBND.L.
IGLT.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index, while CBND.L tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IGLT.L and 0.24% for CBND.L.
Find the right allocation for IGLT.L and CBND.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer