PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLS.L vs. V3PL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLS.L vs. V3PL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (IGLS.L) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3PL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGLS.L is traded in GBP, while V3PL.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the V3PL.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLS.L achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than V3PL.DE's 30.43% return.


IGLS.L

1D
0.21%
1M
0.79%
YTD
0.53%
6M
1.02%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
0.91%

V3PL.DE

1D
-1.71%
1M
4.67%
YTD
30.43%
6M
33.08%
1Y
53.12%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLS.L vs. V3PL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IGLS.L
iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
0.53%5.26%2.65%4.19%2.31%
V3PL.DE
Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing
30.43%22.44%2.73%8.11%6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLS.L and V3PL.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022

0.15

The correlation between IGLS.L and V3PL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLS.L vs. V3PL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLS.L
IGLS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IGLS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

V3PL.DE
V3PL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
V3PL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3PL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3PL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
V3PL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3PL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLS.L vs. V3PL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (IGLS.L) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3PL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGLS.LV3PL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.58

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

4.67

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

16.88

-11.76

IGLS.L vs. V3PL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the V3PL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLS.L and V3PL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGLS.L vs. V3PL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLS.L drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum V3PL.DE drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLS.L and V3PL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLS.LV3PL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-15.48%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.95%

-11.58%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.95%

-15.48%

+13.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-1.75%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-2.91%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

3.21%

-2.63%

Volatility

IGLS.L vs. V3PL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (IGLS.L) is 0.66%, while Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing (V3PL.DE) has a volatility of 6.79%. This indicates that IGLS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than V3PL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLS.LV3PL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

6.79%

-6.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.76%

15.07%

-13.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99%

17.45%

-15.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.67%

14.65%

-11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.18%

14.65%

-12.47%

IGLS.L vs. V3PL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than V3PL.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLS.L vs. V3PL.DE - Dividend Comparison

IGLS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than V3PL.DE's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGLS.L
iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
3.97%3.88%3.67%1.62%0.30%0.25%0.53%0.46%0.33%0.53%0.88%0.48%
V3PL.DE
Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Distributing
1.42%1.90%2.16%2.13%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLS.L and V3PL.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGLS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for V3PL.DE.

IGLS.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while V3PL.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. IGLS.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while V3PL.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IGLS.L and 0.17% for V3PL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLS.L and V3PL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer