PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLO.L vs. EGOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLO.L vs. EGOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Government Bond UCITS (IGLO.L) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGLO.L is traded in USD, while EGOG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EGOG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLO.L achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than EGOG.L's -0.35% return.


IGLO.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-1.63%
6M
-1.00%
1Y
-0.09%
3Y*
1.45%
5Y*
-3.35%
10Y*
-0.82%

EGOG.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
0.58%
1Y
0.86%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
-1.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLO.L vs. EGOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IGLO.L
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS
-1.63%7.14%-3.65%4.00%-17.69%-6.89%1.32%
EGOG.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis
-0.35%11.03%0.81%8.78%-20.85%-3.76%2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLO.L and EGOG.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2020

0.26

Over the past year, IGLO.L and EGOG.L have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLO.L vs. EGOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLO.L
IGLO.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IGLO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

EGOG.L
EGOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
EGOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLO.L vs. EGOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Government Bond UCITS (IGLO.L) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLO.LEGOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.03

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

0.27

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.05

0.57

-0.63

IGLO.L vs. EGOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLO.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the EGOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLO.L and EGOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLO.LEGOG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

0.13

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

-0.27

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

-0.15

+0.27

Drawdowns

IGLO.L vs. EGOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLO.L drawdown since its inception was -28.01%, smaller than the maximum EGOG.L drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLO.L and EGOG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLO.LEGOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.01%

-32.04%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-5.30%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.93%

-10.60%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

-32.04%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.08%

-9.81%

-9.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-12.45%

+3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

3.40%

-1.73%

Volatility

IGLO.L vs. EGOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Government Bond UCITS (IGLO.L) is 2.20%, while UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that IGLO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLO.LEGOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

2.83%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.36%

7.57%

-3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.89%

10.72%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.46%

20.33%

-12.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.66%

19.81%

-13.15%

IGLO.L vs. EGOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IGLO.L and EGOG.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLO.L vs. EGOG.L - Dividend Comparison

IGLO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, more than EGOG.L's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EGOG.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis
2.71%2.91%2.30%1.44%0.44%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGLO.L
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS
3.09%2.86%2.51%1.47%0.78%0.63%0.99%1.21%1.07%0.93%1.09%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLO.L and EGOG.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLO.L and EGOG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

IGLO.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while EGOG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLO.L and EGOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer