IGLD.DE vs. XEQT.TO
IGLD.DE (iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC) and XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLD.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold (EUR Hedged), while XEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. IGLD.DE is passively managed, while XEQT.TO is actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGLD.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XEQT.TO.
Performance
IGLD.DE vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while XEQT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XEQT.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLD.DE achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 10.69% return.
IGLD.DE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 29.44%
- 3Y*
- 28.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEQT.TO
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGLD.DE vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IGLD.DE iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC | 0.35% | 29.90% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 10.69% | 10.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLD.DE and XEQT.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLD.DE vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
IGLD.DE
XEQT.TO
IGLD.DE vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLD.DE | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLD.DE | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 1.94 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
IGLD.DE vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD.DE and XEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLD.DE | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -6.89% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.24% | -2.12% | -14.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -0.96% | -2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | — | — |
Volatility
IGLD.DE vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLD.DE | XEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.80% | 11.84% | +12.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 11.84% | +6.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 11.84% | +6.02% |
IGLD.DE vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLD.DE vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
IGLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IGLD.DE iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.51% | 1.66% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLD.DE and XEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLD.DE.
IGLD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while XEQT.TO is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IGLD.DE and 0.20% for XEQT.TO.
Find the right allocation for IGLD.DE and XEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer