PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLD.DE vs. SILG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLD.DE vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while SILG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SILG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLD.DE achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than SILG.L's 6.58% return.


IGLD.DE

1D
0.70%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
0.35%
6M
4.58%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
28.49%
5Y*
10Y*

SILG.L

1D
0.28%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
6.58%
6M
16.84%
1Y
85.31%
3Y*
45.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLD.DE vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IGLD.DE
iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC
0.35%63.04%24.54%10.49%2.47%
SILG.L
Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
6.58%140.73%19.00%-4.35%11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLD.DE and SILG.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2022

0.67

The correlation between IGLD.DE and SILG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLD.DE vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD.DE
IGLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SILG.L
SILG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SILG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SILG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLD.DE vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLD.DESILG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.07

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

7.42

-3.32

IGLD.DE vs. SILG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the SILG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLD.DE and SILG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLD.DESILG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.87

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.66

+0.66

Drawdowns

IGLD.DE vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, smaller than the maximum SILG.L drawdown of -31.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD.DE and SILG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLD.DESILG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-31.64%

+14.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-30.15%

+12.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-30.15%

+12.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.24%

-23.55%

+7.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-12.87%

+9.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.03%

12.52%

-5.49%

Volatility

IGLD.DE vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) is 5.98%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 18.56%. This indicates that IGLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLD.DESILG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

18.56%

-12.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.79%

40.23%

-18.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.80%

49.50%

-24.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

39.96%

-22.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

39.96%

-22.10%

IGLD.DE vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGLD.DE vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGLD.DE nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLD.DE and SILG.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGLD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.

IGLD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while SILG.L is Silver. IGLD.DE tracks Gold (EUR Hedged), while SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IGLD.DE and 0.65% for SILG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLD.DE and SILG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer