IGLD.DE vs. SGLN.L
IGLD.DE (iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLD.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold (EUR Hedged), while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGLD.DE returned 28.49%/yr vs 27.70%/yr for SGLN.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGLD.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
IGLD.DE vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLD.DE achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than SGLN.L's 4.16% return.
IGLD.DE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 28.86%
- 3Y*
- 28.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 29.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.70%
- 5Y*
- 19.81%
- 10Y*
- 13.11%
IGLD.DE vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD.DE iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC | 0.35% | 63.04% | 24.54% | 10.49% | 2.47% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 4.82% | 45.64% | 34.39% | 9.51% | -0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLD.DE and SGLN.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IGLD.DE and SGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLD.DE vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGLD.DE
SGLN.L
IGLD.DE vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLD.DE | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.73 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 4.42 | -0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLD.DE | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.26 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.57 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
IGLD.DE vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -37.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD.DE and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLD.DE | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -37.02% | +19.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -16.91% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -16.91% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.24% | -15.88% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -13.26% | +9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | 6.64% | +0.39% |
Volatility
IGLD.DE vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) at 4.96%. This indicates that IGLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLD.DE | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 4.96% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.79% | 20.19% | +1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.80% | 23.20% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 16.40% | +1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 14.94% | +2.92% |
IGLD.DE vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLD.DE vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGLD.DE nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, IGLD.DE and SGLN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLD.DE.
IGLD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while SGLN.L is Gold. IGLD.DE tracks Gold (EUR Hedged), while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IGLD.DE and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for IGLD.DE and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer