IGLD.DE vs. IWDA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L).
IGLD.DE and IWDA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGLD.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Gold (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Jul 5, 2022. IWDA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both IGLD.DE and IWDA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IGLD.DE vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IGLD.DE vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD.DE iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC | 7.75% | 63.04% | 24.54% | 10.49% | 2.47% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.82% | 6.67% | 26.97% | 20.54% | -4.12% |
Different Trading Currencies
IGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLD.DE achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.L's -0.82% return.
IGLD.DE
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -9.78%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 21.89%
- 1Y
- 48.04%
- 3Y*
- 30.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWDA.L
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 12.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGLD.DE vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IGLD.DE vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGLD.DE
IWDA.L
IGLD.DE vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLD.DE | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 0.77 | +1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.34 | 1.12 | +1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.17 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 1.58 | +1.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.13 | 6.15 | +3.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLD.DE | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 0.77 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 0.77 | +0.77 |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLD.DE and IWDA.L is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IGLD.DE vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGLD.DE nor IWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IGLD.DE vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, smaller than the maximum IWDA.L drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD.DE and IWDA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLD.DE | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -34.11% | +16.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -11.56% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.06% | -5.16% | -4.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -4.48% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 2.11% | +2.63% |
Volatility
IGLD.DE vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.72% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 5.45%. This indicates that IGLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IGLD.DE | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.72% | 5.45% | +6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.07% | 9.00% | +13.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.70% | 16.12% | +9.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 14.97% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 15.85% | +1.81% |