PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLD.DE vs. GLDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLD.DE vs. GLDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while GLDI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLDI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLD.DE achieves a -10.31% return, which is significantly lower than GLDI's -3.21% return.


IGLD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-11.35%
YTD
-10.31%
6M
-11.59%
1Y
16.98%
3Y*
24.45%
5Y*
10Y*

GLDI

1D
0.90%
1M
-6.84%
YTD
-3.21%
6M
-3.98%
1Y
13.55%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*
7.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLD.DE vs. GLDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IGLD.DE
iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC
-10.31%63.04%24.54%10.49%-0.31%
GLDI
UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033
-3.21%18.31%25.54%5.67%-2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLD.DE and GLDI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2022

0.44

The correlation between IGLD.DE and GLDI shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLD.DE vs. GLDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD.DE
IGLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDI
GLDI Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GLDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDI Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDI Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLD.DE vs. GLDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGLD.DEGLDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.19

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

0.99

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.95

3.10

-1.16

IGLD.DE vs. GLDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the GLDI Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLD.DE and GLDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGLD.DE vs. GLDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.14%, smaller than the maximum GLDI drawdown of -27.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD.DE and GLDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLD.DEGLDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.14%

-27.73%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.14%

-13.78%

-11.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.14%

-13.78%

-11.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.14%

-13.01%

-12.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-8.81%

+4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.71%

4.37%

+4.34%

Volatility

IGLD.DE vs. GLDI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI) at 6.91%. This indicates that IGLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLD.DEGLDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

6.91%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.19%

14.11%

+9.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.98%

15.45%

+10.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

11.36%

+6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.26%

11.34%

+6.92%

IGLD.DE vs. GLDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGLD.DE vs. GLDI - Dividend Comparison

IGLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDI
UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033
27.21%16.15%10.45%10.02%13.73%10.65%14.25%7.25%5.33%7.77%17.26%10.07%
IGLD.DE
iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLD.DE and GLDI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGLD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GLDI.

IGLD.DE tracks Gold (EUR Hedged), while GLDI tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IGLD.DE and 0.65% for GLDI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLD.DE and GLDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer