IGLD.DE vs. FNCW.L
IGLD.DE (iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC) and FNCW.L (SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLD.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold (EUR Hedged), while FNCW.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGLD.DE returned 28.49%/yr vs 20.40%/yr for FNCW.L. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGLD.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FNCW.L.
Performance
IGLD.DE vs. FNCW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while FNCW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FNCW.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLD.DE achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than FNCW.L's 1.24% return.
IGLD.DE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- 1Y
- 30.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNCW.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 12.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
IGLD.DE vs. FNCW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD.DE iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC | 0.35% | 63.04% | 24.54% | 10.49% | 2.56% |
FNCW.L SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF | 1.24% | 14.11% | 34.96% | 12.26% | 5.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLD.DE and FNCW.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2022 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLD.DE vs. FNCW.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGLD.DE
FNCW.L
IGLD.DE vs. FNCW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLD.DE | FNCW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.24 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 3.89 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLD.DE | FNCW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.95 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.35 | +0.97 |
Drawdowns
IGLD.DE vs. FNCW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, smaller than the maximum FNCW.L drawdown of -49.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD.DE and FNCW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLD.DE | FNCW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -49.01% | +31.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -9.77% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -19.18% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.24% | -1.09% | -15.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -12.56% | +8.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | 3.12% | +3.91% |
Volatility
IGLD.DE vs. FNCW.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L) at 2.78%. This indicates that IGLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLD.DE | FNCW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 2.78% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.79% | 9.58% | +12.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.80% | 12.84% | +11.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 19.37% | -1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 21.73% | -3.87% |
IGLD.DE vs. FNCW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FNCW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGLD.DE vs. FNCW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGLD.DE nor FNCW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLD.DE and FNCW.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGLD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FNCW.L.
IGLD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while FNCW.L is Financials Equities. IGLD.DE tracks Gold (EUR Hedged), while FNCW.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IGLD.DE and 0.30% for FNCW.L.
Find the right allocation for IGLD.DE and FNCW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer