PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLA.L vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLA.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Govt Bond UCITS Acc (IGLA.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGLA.L is traded in USD, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLA.L achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 9.81% return.


IGLA.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
-1.33%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
0.06%
3Y*
1.46%
5Y*
-3.36%
10Y*

SWDA.L

1D
0.20%
1M
4.22%
YTD
9.81%
6M
11.17%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
13.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLA.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGLA.L
iShares Global Govt Bond UCITS Acc
-1.33%6.09%-2.98%3.99%-17.80%-6.85%9.45%5.84%-0.51%1.32%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.81%21.14%19.09%23.79%-18.13%22.52%15.68%27.97%-9.23%4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLA.L and SWDA.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017

0.13

Over the past year, IGLA.L and SWDA.L have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLA.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLA.L
IGLA.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IGLA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLA.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Govt Bond UCITS Acc (IGLA.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLA.LSWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.41

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

3.02

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

13.29

-13.25

IGLA.L vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLA.L and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLA.LSWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

2.27

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

0.78

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.73

-0.82

Drawdowns

IGLA.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.01%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLA.L and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLA.LSWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.01%

-33.62%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-8.59%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-17.07%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

-26.50%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.18%

-0.42%

-18.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.90%

-4.58%

-7.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.95%

-0.26%

Volatility

IGLA.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Govt Bond UCITS Acc (IGLA.L) is 2.06%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that IGLA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLA.LSWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

2.81%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.19%

8.58%

-4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.54%

11.41%

-5.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.22%

15.30%

-8.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.74%

15.73%

-8.99%

IGLA.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IGLA.L and SWDA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLA.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGLA.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLA.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLA.L and SWDA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

IGLA.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. IGLA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLA.L and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer