IGDA.L vs. XLEP.L
IGDA.L (Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc) and XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index, while XLEP.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGDA.L returned 21.23%/yr vs 16.98%/yr for XLEP.L. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGDA.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLEP.L.
Performance
IGDA.L vs. XLEP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGDA.L is traded in USD, while XLEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLEP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGDA.L achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly lower than XLEP.L's 31.09% return.
IGDA.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 15.04%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 34.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLEP.L
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 31.09%
- 6M
- 29.31%
- 1Y
- 45.98%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
IGDA.L vs. XLEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc | 15.04% | 18.74% | 17.94% | 29.72% | -14.30% |
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 31.09% | 9.06% | 3.10% | -0.06% | 37.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGDA.L and XLEP.L is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.15 |
The correlation between IGDA.L and XLEP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGDA.L vs. XLEP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
-
Healthcare
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
-
Industrials
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
-
Communication Services
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
-
Basic Materials
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
-
Energy
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
Financial Services
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
-
Real Estate
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
-
Utilities
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGDA.L vs. XLEP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGDA.L
XLEP.L
IGDA.L vs. XLEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) and Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGDA.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.34 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 3.24 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.24 | 10.35 | +4.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGDA.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.03 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.16 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
IGDA.L vs. XLEP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGDA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, smaller than the maximum XLEP.L drawdown of -72.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGDA.L and XLEP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGDA.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.18% | -72.31% | +48.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -14.11% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.12% | -21.12% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -6.43% | +5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -22.81% | +17.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 4.43% | -2.15% |
Volatility
IGDA.L vs. XLEP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) is 4.65%, while Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that IGDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGDA.L | XLEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 8.57% | -3.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.78% | 19.38% | -8.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 22.67% | -8.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 26.87% | -8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 28.91% | -10.27% |
IGDA.L vs. XLEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGDA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLEP.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGDA.L vs. XLEP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGDA.L nor XLEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IGDA.L and XLEP.L have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLEP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLEP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IGDA.L.
IGDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XLEP.L is Energy Equities. IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index, while XLEP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IGDA.L and 0.14% for XLEP.L.
Find the right allocation for IGDA.L and XLEP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer