IGDA.L vs. X7PP.L
IGDA.L (Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc) and X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index, while X7PP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGDA.L returned 18.23%/yr vs 45.97%/yr for X7PP.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGDA.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for X7PP.L.
Performance
IGDA.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGDA.L is traded in USD, while X7PP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the X7PP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGDA.L achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than X7PP.L's 15.00% return.
IGDA.L
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 25.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
X7PP.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 51.53%
- 3Y*
- 45.97%
- 5Y*
- 31.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.80%
IGDA.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc | 12.26% | 18.76% | 17.94% | 29.70% | -20.97% |
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 15.00% | 101.94% | 24.95% | 29.78% | -9.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGDA.L and X7PP.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2022 | 0.54 |
The correlation between IGDA.L and X7PP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGDA.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
-
Healthcare
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
-
Industrials
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
-
Communication Services
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
-
Basic Materials
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
-
Energy
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
-
Financial Services
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
Real Estate
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
-
Utilities
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGDA.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGDA.L
X7PP.L
IGDA.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGDA.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 2.83 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.04 | 8.95 | +1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGDA.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGDA.L drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -62.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGDA.L and X7PP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGDA.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.14% | -62.74% | +35.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -18.12% | +8.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -19.96% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -0.78% | -2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -22.11% | +15.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 5.74% | -3.16% |
Volatility
IGDA.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) is 4.17%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that IGDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGDA.L | X7PP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 5.83% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 20.31% | -8.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 23.81% | -9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 26.31% | -8.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 26.46% | -8.79% |
IGDA.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGDA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGDA.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGDA.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IGDA.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, X7PP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
X7PP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IGDA.L.
IGDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while X7PP.L is Financials Equities. IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index, while X7PP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IGDA.L and 0.20% for X7PP.L.
Find the right allocation for IGDA.L and X7PP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer