PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGDA.L is traded in USD, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGDA.L achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 19.56% return.


IGDA.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
6.32%
YTD
15.04%
6M
15.93%
1Y
34.82%
3Y*
21.23%
5Y*
10Y*

EQQQ.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
8.70%
YTD
19.56%
6M
19.25%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
27.86%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*
21.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IGDA.L
Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc
15.04%18.74%17.94%29.72%-14.30%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
19.56%19.96%26.41%55.59%-22.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IGDA.L and EQQQ.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022

0.81

The correlation between IGDA.L and EQQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L

Technology

41.4%
57.9%

Healthcare

11.3%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
11.6%

Industrials

10.8%
2.8%

Communication Services

9.4%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
6.6%

Basic Materials

4.7%
1.0%

Energy

3.6%
0.5%

Financial Services

2.1%
0.2%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.0%

Utilities

0.3%
1.2%

Technology

IGDA.L
41.4%
EQQQ.L
57.9%

Healthcare

IGDA.L
11.3%
EQQQ.L
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IGDA.L
10.8%
EQQQ.L
11.6%

Industrials

IGDA.L
10.8%
EQQQ.L
2.8%

Communication Services

IGDA.L
9.4%
EQQQ.L
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

IGDA.L
4.7%
EQQQ.L
6.6%

Basic Materials

IGDA.L
4.7%
EQQQ.L
1.0%

Energy

IGDA.L
3.6%
EQQQ.L
0.5%

Financial Services

IGDA.L
2.1%
EQQQ.L
0.2%

Real Estate

IGDA.L
1.0%
EQQQ.L
0.0%

Utilities

IGDA.L
0.3%
EQQQ.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGDA.L
IGDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGDA.LEQQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.64

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.24

13.38

+1.85

IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGDA.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGDA.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.61

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.81

+0.03

Drawdowns

IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGDA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGDA.L and EQQQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGDA.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.18%

-50.98%

+26.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-11.03%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.12%

-22.63%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.75%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-7.06%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

3.00%

-0.72%

Volatility

IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.34%. This indicates that IGDA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGDA.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

4.34%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.78%

11.19%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

15.34%

-1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.64%

20.50%

-1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.64%

19.85%

-1.21%

IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGDA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

IGDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
IGDA.L
Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGDA.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IGDA.L.

IGDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IGDA.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGDA.L and EQQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer