IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L
IGDA.L (Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index, while EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGDA.L returned 21.23%/yr vs 27.86%/yr for EQQQ.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGDA.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.L.
Performance
IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGDA.L is traded in USD, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGDA.L achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 19.56% return.
IGDA.L
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 15.04%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 34.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQQQ.L
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 19.56%
- 6M
- 19.25%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 27.86%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- 21.58%
IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc | 15.04% | 18.74% | 17.94% | 29.72% | -14.30% |
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 19.56% | 19.96% | 26.41% | 55.59% | -22.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGDA.L and EQQQ.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IGDA.L and EQQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
Healthcare
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
Industrials
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
Communication Services
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
Consumer Defensive
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
Basic Materials
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
Energy
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
Financial Services
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
Real Estate
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
Utilities
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGDA.L
EQQQ.L
IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGDA.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 3.64 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.24 | 13.38 | +1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGDA.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.61 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.81 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGDA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGDA.L and EQQQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGDA.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.18% | -50.98% | +26.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -11.03% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.12% | -22.63% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -0.75% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -7.06% | +1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 3.00% | -0.72% |
Volatility
IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.34%. This indicates that IGDA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGDA.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 4.34% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.78% | 11.19% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 15.34% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 20.50% | -1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 19.85% | -1.21% |
IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGDA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGDA.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
IGDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.72% |
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGDA.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IGDA.L.
IGDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IGDA.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.
Find the right allocation for IGDA.L and EQQQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer