IGAA.L vs. CYGB.L
IGAA.L (iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CYGB.L (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - IGAA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while CYGB.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGAA.L returned -0.18%/yr vs 5.08%/yr for CYGB.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGAA.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CYGB.L.
Performance
IGAA.L vs. CYGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGAA.L is traded in USD, while CYGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CYGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGAA.L achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly lower than CYGB.L's 4.04% return.
IGAA.L
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- -4.55%
- 1Y
- -5.18%
- 3Y*
- 1.27%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- —
CYGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- —
IGAA.L vs. CYGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGAA.L iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.55% | 5.88% | 1.45% | 4.93% | -8.03% | -1.88% |
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 4.04% | 9.91% | 9.53% | 12.79% | -8.81% | -1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGAA.L and CYGB.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021 | 0.41 |
The correlation between IGAA.L and CYGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGAA.L vs. CYGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGAA.L
CYGB.L
IGAA.L vs. CYGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGAA.L) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGAA.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.11 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 1.08 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.62 | 2.45 | -4.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGAA.L vs. CYGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGAA.L drawdown since its inception was -21.59%, roughly equal to the maximum CYGB.L drawdown of -22.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGAA.L and CYGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGAA.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.59% | -22.10% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -4.04% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.68% | -6.72% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.76% | -21.63% | +2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | 0.00% | -5.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -4.36% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 1.78% | +1.41% |
Volatility
IGAA.L vs. CYGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGAA.L) is 1.46%, while iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that IGAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CYGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGAA.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 1.98% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.91% | 5.70% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.60% | 7.38% | -1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.29% | 8.87% | -2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.13% | 8.74% | -2.61% |
IGAA.L vs. CYGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGAA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CYGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGAA.L vs. CYGB.L - Dividend Comparison
IGAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CYGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.70% | 1.84% | 2.13% | 2.38% | 2.68% | 2.21% |
IGAA.L iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGAA.L and CYGB.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CYGB.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CYGB.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IGAA.L.
IGAA.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while CYGB.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. IGAA.L tracks iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while CYGB.L tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IGAA.L and 0.40% for CYGB.L.
Find the right allocation for IGAA.L and CYGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer