PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IFRA.AX vs. GLIN.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IFRA.AX vs. GLIN.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

IFRA.AX (VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF) and GLIN.AX (iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF) are both Global Equities funds - IFRA.AX tracks the VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index while GLIN.AX tracks the iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IFRA.AX returned 11.07%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for GLIN.AX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

IFRA.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (IFRA.AX) and iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFRA.AX achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than GLIN.AX's 12.44% return.

IFRA.AX

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.16%
6M
11.95%
YTD
10.62%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
6.41%

GLIN.AX

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.78%
6M
12.69%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFRA.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
IFRA.AX
VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		10.62%11.93%10.70%-1.00%
GLIN.AX
iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		12.44%12.04%12.01%0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IFRA.AX and GLIN.AX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023

0.80

The correlation between IFRA.AX and GLIN.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

Return for Risk

IFRA.AX vs. GLIN.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IFRA.AX
IFRA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IFRA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX
GLIN.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GLIN.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFRA.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (IFRA.AX) and iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IFRA.AXGLIN.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.52
1.72

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.19
2.41

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

3.19

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.68

9.92

-2.25

IFRA.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFRA.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the GLIN.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFRA.AX and GLIN.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFRA.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFRA.AX drawdown since its inception was -36.36%, which is greater than GLIN.AX's maximum drawdown of -12.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA.AX and GLIN.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IFRA.AXGLIN.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.36%

-12.66%

-23.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.54%

-5.76%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.79%

-12.66%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.19%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.36%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-1.16%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-2.24%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.87%

+0.33%

Volatility

IFRA.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (IFRA.AX) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX) at 3.15%. This indicates that IFRA.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLIN.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IFRA.AXGLIN.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.15%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

8.80%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

10.72%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

12.33%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.06%

12.33%

+2.73%

Dividends

IFRA.AX vs. GLIN.AX - Dividend Comparison

IFRA.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than GLIN.AX's 5.93% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GLIN.AX
iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		5.93%2.94%2.60%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IFRA.AX
VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		2.23%3.15%1.61%2.51%2.31%2.93%3.58%3.29%2.91%2.11%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

IFRA.AX and GLIN.AX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFRA.AX tracks VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index, while GLIN.AX tracks iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFRA.AX and GLIN.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer