PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IFRA.AX vs. CNEW.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IFRA.AX vs. CNEW.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

IFRA.AX (VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF) and CNEW.AX (VanEck China New Economy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFRA.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index, while CNEW.AX is a China Equities fund tracking the MarketGrader China New Economy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IFRA.AX returned 6.59%/yr vs -1.69%/yr for CNEW.AX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IFRA.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (IFRA.AX) and VanEck China New Economy ETF (CNEW.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFRA.AX achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly higher than CNEW.AX's 1.87% return.

IFRA.AX

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.16%
6M
11.95%
YTD
10.62%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
6.41%

CNEW.AX

1D
-1.71%
1M
2.64%
6M
-3.46%
YTD
1.87%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
-1.69%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFRA.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IFRA.AX
VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		10.62%11.93%10.70%-1.66%-4.04%16.80%-8.44%23.88%-2.62%
CNEW.AX
VanEck China New Economy ETF		1.87%15.14%11.63%-7.15%-26.85%14.22%26.35%40.10%1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between IFRA.AX and CNEW.AX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2018

0.02

The correlation between IFRA.AX and CNEW.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (5 years) to 0.06 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

VanEck China New Economy ETF

Return for Risk

IFRA.AX vs. CNEW.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IFRA.AX
IFRA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IFRA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFRA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
CNEW.AX
CNEW.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CNEW.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNEW.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNEW.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CNEW.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNEW.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFRA.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (IFRA.AX) and VanEck China New Economy ETF (CNEW.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IFRA.AXCNEW.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.52
0.61

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.19
1.00

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.13

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

0.87

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.68

2.09

+5.58

IFRA.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFRA.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the CNEW.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFRA.AX and CNEW.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFRA.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFRA.AX drawdown since its inception was -36.36%, smaller than the maximum CNEW.AX drawdown of -46.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA.AX and CNEW.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IFRA.AXCNEW.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.36%

-46.20%

+9.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.54%

-13.25%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.79%

-27.71%

+14.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.19%

-46.20%

+25.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.36%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-13.40%

+11.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-17.27%

+11.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

5.61%

-3.41%

Volatility

IFRA.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (IFRA.AX) is 3.82%, while VanEck China New Economy ETF (CNEW.AX) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that IFRA.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNEW.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IFRA.AXCNEW.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

5.62%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

15.27%

-6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

18.99%

-8.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

24.49%

-10.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.06%

24.61%

-9.55%

Dividends

IFRA.AX vs. CNEW.AX - Dividend Comparison

IFRA.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than CNEW.AX's 0.74% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CNEW.AX
VanEck China New Economy ETF		0.74%0.88%1.71%1.72%1.86%1.03%1.40%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IFRA.AX
VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		2.23%3.15%1.61%2.51%2.31%2.93%3.58%3.29%2.91%2.11%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

IFRA.AX and CNEW.AX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFRA.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while CNEW.AX is China Equities. IFRA.AX tracks VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index, while CNEW.AX tracks MarketGrader China New Economy Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFRA.AX and CNEW.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer