PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFAFX vs. MHEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFAFX vs. MHEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 (IFAFX) and MH Elite Income Fund of Funds (MHEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFAFX achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly higher than MHEIX's 2.09% return. Over the past 10 years, IFAFX has outperformed MHEIX with an annualized return of 8.14%, while MHEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.99% annualized return.


IFAFX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.05%
6M
4.61%
YTD
6.91%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
13.40%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
8.14%

MHEIX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.37%
6M
1.69%
YTD
2.09%
1Y
6.75%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFAFX vs. MHEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IFAFX
American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1
6.91%17.71%10.76%6.76%-6.48%17.28%4.40%18.41%-5.33%12.48%
MHEIX
MH Elite Income Fund of Funds
2.09%4.76%5.98%7.55%-9.83%2.44%5.27%11.10%-3.24%5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IFAFX and MHEIX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between IFAFX and MHEIX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFAFX vs. MHEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFAFX
IFAFX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IFAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IFAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MHEIX
MHEIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MHEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MHEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFAFX vs. MHEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 (IFAFX) and MH Elite Income Fund of Funds (MHEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFAFXMHEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.49

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.67

3.69

+3.98

IFAFX vs. MHEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the MHEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFAFX and MHEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFAFX vs. MHEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFAFX drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, which is greater than MHEIX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFAFX and MHEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFAFXMHEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.90%

-16.95%

-24.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.11%

-4.54%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.63%

-6.57%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-13.62%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.13%

-16.95%

-9.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.81%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-2.47%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.83%

-0.15%

Volatility

IFAFX vs. MHEIX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 (IFAFX) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to MH Elite Income Fund of Funds (MHEIX) at 0.94%. This indicates that IFAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MHEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFAFXMHEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

0.94%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.84%

5.92%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.40%

6.23%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.48%

5.58%

+3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.62%

5.23%

+5.39%

IFAFX vs. MHEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFAFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than MHEIX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFAFX vs. MHEIX - Dividend Comparison

IFAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, more than MHEIX's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFAFX
American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1
9.38%9.91%6.33%2.90%6.94%6.61%2.76%4.95%7.39%4.20%3.01%5.02%
MHEIX
MH Elite Income Fund of Funds
3.71%0.00%3.33%2.38%3.17%1.49%2.30%2.21%2.10%1.69%2.48%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFAFX and MHEIX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFAFX has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to MHEIX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFAFX dropped -41.90% vs MHEIX's -16.95%.

IFAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFAFX and MHEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer