IFAFX vs. GLBIX

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

IFAFX (American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1) and GLBIX (Leuthold Global Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, IFAFX returned 8.31%/yr vs 6.74%/yr for GLBIX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IFAFX charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for GLBIX.

Performance

IFAFX vs. GLBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 (IFAFX) and Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFAFX achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than GLBIX's 15.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IFAFX has outperformed GLBIX with an annualized return of 8.31%, while GLBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.74% annualized return.

IFAFX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: 5.47%
• 6M: 6.04%
• 1Y: 14.17%
• 3Y*: 12.72%
• 5Y*: 8.02%
• 10Y*: 8.31%

GLBIX

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 15.15%
• 6M: 15.76%
• 1Y: 27.05%
• 3Y*: 13.06%
• 5Y*: 7.76%
• 10Y*: 6.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFAFX vs. GLBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IFAFX American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1	5.47%	17.71%	10.76%	6.76%	-6.48%	17.28%	4.40%	18.41%	-5.33%	12.48%
GLBIX Leuthold Global Fund	15.15%	17.72%	1.08%	8.32%	-7.91%	15.01%	7.52%	9.36%	-12.85%	16.84%

Correlation

The correlation between IFAFX and GLBIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009	0.85

The correlation between IFAFX and GLBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IFAFX vs. GLBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFAFX

IFAFX Risk / Return Rank: 47
IFAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
IFAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
IFAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
IFAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
IFAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

GLBIX

GLBIX Risk / Return Rank: 90
GLBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GLBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
GLBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GLBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GLBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFAFX vs. GLBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 (IFAFX) and Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IFAFX	GLBIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	3.00	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	4.31	-1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.59	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	4.25	-1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.59	14.99	-6.39

IFAFX vs. GLBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the GLBIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFAFX and GLBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IFAFX vs. GLBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFAFX drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, which is greater than GLBIX's maximum drawdown of -26.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFAFX and GLBIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFAFX	GLBIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.90%	-26.82%	-15.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.11%	-6.39%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.63%	-6.39%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.84%	-16.14%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.13%	-26.82%	+0.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.99%	0.00%	-1.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.92%	-4.85%	+0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	1.81%	-0.16%

Volatility

IFAFX vs. GLBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 (IFAFX) is 2.28%, while Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that IFAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IFAFX	GLBIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.28%	4.09%	-1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.81%	7.78%	-1.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.39%	9.06%	-1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.50%	9.16%	+0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.69%	9.66%	+1.03%

IFAFX vs. GLBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFAFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than GLBIX's 1.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFAFX vs. GLBIX - Dividend Comparison

IFAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.51%, more than GLBIX's 8.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLBIX Leuthold Global Fund	8.44%	9.71%	8.31%	2.52%	5.18%	1.89%	0.25%	1.04%	8.48%	9.31%	9.66%	3.75%
IFAFX American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1	9.51%	9.91%	6.33%	2.90%	6.94%	6.61%	2.76%	4.95%	7.39%	4.20%	3.01%	5.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFAFX and GLBIX in my portfolio?

IFAFX and GLBIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IFAFX or GLBIX?

GLBIX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to IFAFX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFAFX dropped -41.90% vs GLBIX's -26.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.