IFAFX vs. GGSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 (IFAFX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX).
IFAFX is an actively managed fund by American Funds. It was launched on Dec 1, 1973. GGSIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 1, 1998.
Performance
IFAFX vs. GGSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IFAFX vs. GGSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFAFX American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 | 1.43% | 17.71% | 10.76% | 6.76% | -6.48% | 17.28% | 4.40% | 18.41% | -5.33% | 12.48% |
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | -4.20% | 19.29% | 19.26% | 17.83% | -16.86% | 17.04% | 14.34% | 24.92% | -10.65% | 21.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFAFX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than GGSIX's -4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, IFAFX has underperformed GGSIX with an annualized return of 8.13%, while GGSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.
IFAFX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 4.15%
- 1Y
- 14.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
GGSIX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- -4.20%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IFAFX vs. GGSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFAFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than GGSIX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IFAFX vs. GGSIX — Risk / Return Rank
IFAFX
GGSIX
IFAFX vs. GGSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 (IFAFX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFAFX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | 1.15 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 1.54 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.23 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.07 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 4.87 | +3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFAFX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.15 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.63 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.70 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.44 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between IFAFX and GGSIX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IFAFX vs. GGSIX - Dividend Comparison
IFAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.83%, less than GGSIX's 12.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFAFX American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 | 9.83% | 9.91% | 6.33% | 2.90% | 6.94% | 6.61% | 2.76% | 4.95% | 7.39% | 4.20% | 3.01% | 5.02% |
GGSIX Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio | 12.39% | 11.87% | 12.21% | 1.73% | 5.76% | 6.57% | 3.47% | 5.77% | 3.02% | 2.77% | 1.35% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
IFAFX vs. GGSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFAFX drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, smaller than the maximum GGSIX drawdown of -52.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFAFX and GGSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFAFX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.90% | -52.85% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.22% | -10.84% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.84% | -26.74% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.13% | -30.36% | +4.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -8.71% | +2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -9.25% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 2.51% | -0.77% |
Volatility
IFAFX vs. GGSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 (IFAFX) is 2.90%, while Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that IFAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IFAFX | GGSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 4.54% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | 8.19% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.47% | 13.32% | -3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.46% | 13.34% | -3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.66% | 14.27% | -3.61% |