IEXA.DE vs. PRAC.DE
IEXA.DE (iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and PRAC.DE (Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - IEXA.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Corporate ex-Financials Bond while PRAC.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IEXA.DE returned 4.16%/yr vs 4.75%/yr for PRAC.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEXA.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PRAC.DE.
Performance
IEXA.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IEXA.DE having a 1.30% return and PRAC.DE slightly lower at 1.29%.
IEXA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 2.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRAC.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- —
IEXA.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEXA.DE iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 1.30% | 2.47% | 3.54% | 7.38% | -5.39% |
PRAC.DE Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A | 1.29% | 3.07% | 4.27% | 7.52% | -5.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEXA.DE and PRAC.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IEXA.DE and PRAC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEXA.DE vs. PRAC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IEXA.DE
PRAC.DE
IEXA.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IEXA.DE) and Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEXA.DE | PRAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.15 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 0.95 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | 3.23 | -0.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEXA.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEXA.DE drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, smaller than the maximum PRAC.DE drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEXA.DE and PRAC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEXA.DE | PRAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -17.87% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.56% | -2.70% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.56% | -2.70% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.97% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -6.21% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 0.79% | +0.01% |
Volatility
IEXA.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares EUR Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF EUR Acc (IEXA.DE) and Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF A (PRAC.DE) have volatilities of 0.78% and 0.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEXA.DE | PRAC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 0.82% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 2.73% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26% | 3.24% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.77% | 4.56% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.77% | 4.79% | -0.02% |
IEXA.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEXA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PRAC.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEXA.DE vs. PRAC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IEXA.DE nor PRAC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IEXA.DE and PRAC.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEXA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEXA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRAC.DE.
IEXA.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate ex-Financials Bond, while PRAC.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IEXA.DE and 0.50% for PRAC.DE.
Find the right allocation for IEXA.DE and PRAC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer